3. Would it be practicable for several schools to secure a lecturer on some special subject in library economy who should give the regular work in that subject in each of these schools? An example of a beginning in this direction is Edna Lyman Scott's work in several schools.
4. Would it be possible for the several schools to combine in securing a lecturer each year to give a short series of lectures on some one subject, these lectures to be seriously worked up, and to be published after being delivered? The final publication of the lectures, and the combined remuneration from several schools, might be a sufficient incentive to capable persons to do their best work.
5. Are the subjects now in our curricula properly balanced? Is too much time given to learning cataloging and other routine, and consequently too little to a consideration of methods of extending the use of the library by the public?
6. Is it as easy to secure transfer of credit from one school to another as it should be?
Information on the following subjects connected with library school work has been collected, reported on and discussed in our meetings.
1. The cost of library schools and a rough analysis of their expenditures.
2. Specialization among library schools.
3. Book selection as a course in library schools.
4. The method of revising students' work.
5. Efficiency of administration in library schools.