su-ši-šù equals noun su-ši and postposition šù. su-ši: SU.ŠI means “increase of eye” and eqnals šalummatu which means “splendour”, or perhaps “terror”. SU.ŠI might be read su-lim. SU.ZI, however, has the same meaning (see Br. 235 and 187, also MSL. p. 298), proving the reading SU.ŠI.
mu-ra-du-ud: mu (see [Hymn to Bêl, line 18]). ra is an infix of adverbial character denoting motion (MSL. p. XXIV). du-ud is no doubt for du-du, an intensified form of du (see [Hymn to Bêl, line 23], gin).
[21.] mulu dumu-mu rù gin-na-gin-na a-ba zi-gi-en te-ga
When thou who art my son goest violently about, who can attack like thee?
mulu dumu-mu (see on [line 16]).
rù equals naḳâpu, “break forth violently”, or “storm furiously”, (Br. 9144). Here we come near to the primary idea of the sign which is that of “the goring bull” (see [Hymn to Sin, line 14]).
gin-na-gin-na: DU = alâku may have any one of three values, gin, tum or rà (Br. 4871). gin is the correct value here, as is shown by the phonetic complement na. The value du must be closely related to tum and gin. du by change of d to t and by addition of the nasal m becomes tum. tum by change of t to g, of u to i and of m to n becomes gin.
a-ba equals mannu, “who” (Br. 11370). See also below.
zi-gi-en probably is a phonetic and dialectic form for za-e-gim ([line 22]).
te-ga: te equals ṭeḥû, “attack” (Br. 7688). ga: BA is probably dialectic for ga (Br. 103) which would be the same as PISANNU, i. e., bašû, “being”, or šakânu, “establishing”.