[1794] 332 U.S. 631 (1948).
[1795] On the activities of the Board, in which representatives of both races participate and from which both races have benefited, see Remarks of Hon. Spessard L. Holland of Florida. Cong. Rec., 81st Cong., 2d sess., v. 96, p. 465-470.
[1796] Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 18 How. 421, 433 (1856).
[1797] St. Louis & S.F.R. Co. v. James, 161 U.S. 545, 562 (1896).
[1798] Poole v. Fleeger, 11 Pet. 185, 209 (1837); Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 12 Pet. 657, 725 (1838).
[1799] Hinderlider v. La Plata Co., 304 U.S. 92, 104, 106 (1938).
[1800] Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. 1, 13 (1823); Virginia v. West Virginia, 246 U.S. 565 (1918). See also Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 13 How. 518, 566 (1852); Olin v. Kitzmiller, 259 U.S. 260 (1922).
[1801] Virginia v. West Virginia, 246 U.S. 565, 601 (1918).
[1802] Dyer v. Sims, 341 U.S. 22 (1951). The case stemmed from mandamus proceedings brought to compel the auditor of West Virginia to pay out money to a commission which had been created by a compact between West Virginia and other States to control pollution of the Ohio River. The decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denying mandamus was reversed by the Supreme Court, and the case remanded. The opinion of the Court, by Justice Frankfurter, reviews and revises the West Virginia Court's interpretation of the State constitution, thereby opening up, temporarily at least, a new field of power for judicial review. Justice Reed, challenging this extension of judicial review, thought the issue determined by the Supremacy Clause. Justice Jackson urged that the compact power was "inherent in sovereignty" and hence was limited only by the requirement of congressional consent. Justice Black concurred in the result without opinion.