[128] Carpenters Union v. Ritter's Cafe, 315 U.S. 722, 728 (1942).
[129] Giboney v. Empire Storage Co., 336 U.S. 490 (1949).
[130] Ibid. 501, 502, citing Fox v. Washington, 236 U.S. 273, 277, which predates any suggestion of the clear and present danger formula. See [above].
[131] Lincoln Union v. Northwestern Co., 335 U.S. 525 (1949); A.F. of L. v. American Sash Co., ibid., 538.
[132] Auto Workers v. Wis. Board, 336 U.S. 245 (1949). In Teamsters Union v. Hanke, 339 U.S. 470 (1950), injunctions by State courts against picketing of a self-employer's place of business to compel him to adopt a union shop were sustained.
[133] Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516 (1945).
[134] Ibid. 566.
[135] Patterson v. Colorado, 205 U.S. 454 (1907). Cf. Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States, 247 U.S. 402 (1918) in which the Court affirmed a judgment imposing a fine for contempt of court on an editor who had criticized the action of a federal judge in a pending case. The majority held that such conviction did not violate the First Amendment. Justices Holmes and Brandeis dissented on the ground that the proceedings did not come within the applicable federal statute, but did not discuss the constitutional issue. This decision was overruled in Nye v. United States, 313 U.S. 33 (1941).
[136] 314 U.S. 252 (1941).
[137] Ibid. 271.