[333] Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U.S. 557 (1899).
[334] Hoopeston Canning Co. v. Cullen, 318 U.S. 313 (1943).
[335] German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Hale, 219 U.S. 307 (1911). See also Carroll v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 199 U.S. 401 (1905).
[336] Life & C. Ins. Co. v. McCray, 291 U.S. 566 (1934).
[337] Northwestern Nat. L. Ins. Co. v. Riggs, 203 U.S. 243 (1906).
[338] Whitfield ex rel. Hadley v. Aetna L. Ins. Co., 205 U.S. 489 (1907).
[339] Polk v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, 207 U.S. 310 (1907).
[340] Neblett v. Carpenter, 305 U.S. 297 (1938).
[341] Brazee v. Michigan, 241 U.S. 340 (1916).—With four Justices dissenting, the Court, in Adams v. Tanner, 244 U.S. 590 (1917), "struck down a State law absolutely prohibiting maintenance of private employment agencies." Commenting on the "constitutional philosophy" thereof in Lincoln Union v. Northwestern Co., 335 U.S. 525, 535 (1949), Justice Black stated that Olsen v. Nebraska, 313 U.S. 236 (1941), (see p. [997]) "clearly undermined Adams v. Tanner."
[342] Liggett (Louis K.) Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U.S. 105 (1928).