[777] Turner v. New York, 168 U.S. 90, 94 (1897).
[778] Soper v. Lawrence Bros. Co., 201 U.S. 359 (1906). Nor is a former owner who had not been in possession for five years after and fifteen years before said enactment thereby deprived of any property without due process.
[779] Mattson v. Department of Labor, 293 U.S. 151, 154 (1934).
[780] Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620, 623, 628 (1885).
[781] Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson, 325 U.S. 304 (1945).
[782] Gange Lumber Co. v. Rowley, 326 U.S. 295 (1945).
[783] Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620, 623 (1885). See also Stewart v. Keyes, 295 U.S. 403, 417 (1935).
[784] Home Ins. Co. v. Dick, 281 U.S. 397, 398 (1930).
[785] Hawkins v. Bleakly, 243 U.S. 210, 214 (1917); James-Dickinson Farm Mortg. Co. v. Harry, 273 U.S. 119, 124 (1927). An omission in a criminal trial of any reference to the presumption of innocence effects no denial of due process of law where the State appellate court ruled that such omission did not invalidate the proceedings. Howard v. Fleming, 191 U.S. 126, 136 (1903).
[786] Manley v. Georgia, 279 U.S. 1, 5 (1929); Western & A.R. Co. v. Henderson, 279 U.S. 639, 642 (1929); Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, 233 (1911); Mobile, J. & K.C.R. Co. v. Turnipseed, 219 U.S. 35, 42 (1910).