, and Bekenrenef has
. The Turin copy has
; and the context does not help us. Of these four readings (and there are probably others which I do not know) that of Bekenrenef seems to me the best; but
, and Bekenrenef has
. The Turin copy has
; and the context does not help us. Of these four readings (and there are probably others which I do not know) that of Bekenrenef seems to me the best; but