| Annual cost much more than | $1,500,000 |
| The books in them are many more than | 13,000,000 |
| Books added yearly are many more than | 500,000 |
| Books used yearly are many more than | 10,000,000 |
These institutions, therefore, represent a large money investment, and a very extensive and active educational agency. Not all of them by any means are “free public libraries,”—i.e., libraries supported by taxes or endowments for the use of all. But a considerable portion of them are. It may now be justly said that no town of importance is respectably complete without a free public library any more than any town whatever without a school.
The San Francisco Free Public Library was founded in 1879, and was advancing with creditable speed towards a size and usefulness corresponding to the position of San Francisco, among American cities, until the present city government suddenly cut down its annual appropriation to bare running expenses, leaving no allowance for buying new books, or even for replacing old ones worn out.
This library is not a collection of mummies of deceased learning, which will be no drier in a thousand years than they are now. It has thus far consisted of live books for live people. But a library of this practically useful kind, if it stops buying new books, quickly becomes dead stock,—unattractive, obsolete, useless. In belles-lettres, literature, history, mechanic arts, engineering, applied science, all alike, it is equally indispensable to have the new books. The photographer, the druggist, the electrician, the machinist, the manufacturing chemist, as much as or more than the reader of novels, poetry, travels, or history, want this year's discoveries, for last year's are already obsolete. Next year it will not be Mr. Blaine's book that will be most called for,—that will be a year old,—but General Grant's book. But a thousand examples would not make the case clearer. This prohibition of new books, perhaps on pretence of economy, would be the natural first step of shrewd opponents intending to close the library entirely as soon as the books are dead enough. It is girdling the tree now, so as to destroy it more early next year. It is understood that at least two prominent members of the present city government (Supervisor Pond and Auditor Strother) are distinctly opposed to the library, and to free public libraries, on principle. It is not known that any member of it is a particularly energetic friend of the institution. The library staff is small in number (seven boys and eight adults); the salaries (omitting the librarian's) exceptionally scanty, and even this small patronage and expenditure is wholly controlled by the Board of Trustees, and wholly out of reach of the Board of Supervisors. When this is remembered it is easy to understand both the probable firmness of any opposition, and the probable lukewarmness of any friendship to the library in the latter body. This is perfectly natural. All governing bodies try to keep and increase their authority over persons and payments. They never let go of them when they can help it. And, accordingly, the Supervisors insisted on controlling all the expenditure and management of the library, until a decision of the Supreme Court of the State forced the control out of their hands.
Whether the actual closing of the library is intended or not, the obvious first step towards it has been taken, and its closing will follow in due season, if the policy is continued. If the voters of San Francisco choose to have it so, there is no more to be said, for it is their library. Probably they could lawfully divide up the books among themselves, and so close out the enterprise. The dividend, now, would be not far from one volume to each household in the city. But, if they wish the library to continue, this early notice is due them.
Further: the custom here, in respect to the contents of municipal public documents, prevents such discussions of library questions as are usual in the annual reports of other city libraries; so that, if a view of principles and practices in and about such institutions as a class, and of their application in this instance, is to be laid before the public at all, it must be submitted, as in this paper, unofficially.
The following table shows the financial, and some of the literary, relations between public libraries and cities in San Francisco, in four other large cities, and in six small cities. The cases were taken promiscuously as they came to hand, of the latest dates available, but all are within a few years. New York has no free public library; movements to establish one there have repeatedly been contemplated, but have been abandoned, because the men who could have set up the library would not encounter the practical certainty of its becoming one more corruptionist engine in the hands of the city rulers. Philadelphia has none, for reasons not known to the present writer, but, very likely, the same as in New York. St. Louis has none now, although its excellent Public School Library may, very likely, become one. New Orleans has none, apparently, because it doesn't want any. Louisville has none, because the devil cannot set up a true church; the enormous lottery swindle which was worked off there a few years ago was ostensibly to establish and endow one, but where did the money go?
| Cities | Population (1880) | Assessed Value in Millions (1880) | Whole City Tax | Gives its Library | Being, of whole tax | Vols. in Library | Vols. per soul (about) | Circulation per year | Being per soul (about) | And per $1.00 of salaries | Volumes added yearly |
| Boston | 362,000 | $613 | $7,261,741 | $120,000 | 1/60 | 438,594 | 1 1/5 | 1,056,906 | 3 | 14 | 16,478 |
| Chicago | 503,000 | 118 | 3,776,451 | 54,330 | 1/75 | 111,621 | 1/5+ | 664,867 | 1 1/3 | 23 1/4 | 5,280 |
| Cincinnati | 255,139 | 169 1/3 | 4,070,225 | 49,016 | 1/82 | 153,870 | 3/5+ | 730,544 | 3 | 26 1/6 | 4,120 |
| Lynn | 38,274 | 22 1/2 | 332,481 | 5,730 | 1/58 | 32,006 | 4/5 | 90,330 | 2 1/3 | 36 | 1,264 |
| Milwaukee | 115,587 | 55 3/4 | 902,537 | 17,697 | 1/51 | 24,481 | 1/5 | 83,052 | 3/4 | 16 | 2,778 |
| New Bedford | 26,875 | 25 3/4 | 390,208 | 5,148 | 1/76 | 45,000 | 1 4/5 | 71,798 | 3 | ... | 2,448 |
| Newburyport | 13,537 | 7 1/2 | 105,686 | 1,661 | 1/64 | 17,828 | 1 1/3 | ... | ... | ... | 441 |
| Springfield, Mass. | 33,340 | 29 1/2 | 307,434 | 8,231 | 1/37 | 48,832 | 1 1/2 | 57,152 | 1 3/4 | 14 3/4 | 1,797 |
| Taunton | 21,213 | 15 3/4 | 213,912 | 5,195 | 1/41 | 21,197 | 1 | 58,920 | 2 9/10 | 31 1/2 | 1,971 |
| Worcester | 58,291 | 39 1/2 | 557,193 | 14,860 | 1/38 | 61,204 | 1+ | 194,321 | 3 1/3 | 26 6/7 | 3,105 |
| San Francisco | 233,959 | 225 | 2,252,000 | 18,000 | 1/125 | 62,647 | 1/4+ | 326,000 | 1 1/4 | 36 | [3]3,883 |
[3] Next year none except gifts.