231 ([return])
[ Prajas offspring, including, as Sankara says, both mobile, and immobile, therefore, not mankind alone.]
232 ([return])
[ Bhava-samanwitas is explained by Sreedhara as “full of love”, which K. T. Telang accepts. Sankara explains it as “endued with penetration into the knowledge of the Supreme object.”]
233 ([return])
[ Tityam, ever, is connected with what follows and not what precedes. Thus Sreedhara. Mr. Davies connects it with Kathayantas.]
234 ([return])
[ K. T. Telang renders buddhi-yogam as knowledge; Mr. Davies, as mental devotion and Sankara, “devotion by special insight.”]
235 ([return])
[ To know thee fully is impossible. In what particular forms or manifestations, therefore, shall I think of thee? The word Bhava in the second line is rendered “entities” by K. T. Telang, and “form of being” by Mr. Davies.]