CONTENTS
| PAGE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Preface by Sidney Lee | [v] | ||
| Some Notes on Shakespeare’s Reputation | [1] | ||
| PART I | |||
| “THESE THREE HUNDRED YEARS” | |||
| THE FIRST PERIOD | |||
| 1596 | Francis Meres | [35] | |
| 1598 | Richard Barnfield | [36] | |
| 1599 | John Weever | [37] | |
| 1610 | John Davies | [38] | |
| 1614 | Thomas Freeman | [39] | |
| 1622 | William Basse | [40] | |
| 1623 | Anonymous | [41] | |
| 1623 | Ben Jonson | [42] | |
| 1623 | Hugh Holland | [45] | |
| 1623 | John Heminge and Henrie Condell | [46] | |
| 1623 | Leonard Digges | [47] | |
| 1627 | Michael Drayton | [48] | |
| 1630 | John Milton | [49] | |
| 1632 | I. M. S. | [50] | |
| a. | 1633 | John Hales | [53] |
| 1637 | Sir William D’Avenant | [54] | |
| c. | 1637 | Anonymous | [55] |
| 1639 | Thomas Bancroft | [57] | |
| 1647 | George Daniel | [58] | |
| 1651 | Samuel Sheppard | [59] | |
| c. | 1661 | Thomas Fuller | [61] |
| 1662-7 | Samuel Pepys | [62] | |
| 1664 | Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle | [64] | |
| 1667 | John Dryden | [66] | |
| 1668 | John Dryden | [67] | |
| 1672 | Anonymous | [69] | |
| 1675 | Edward Phillips | [71] | |
| 1680 | Thomas Otway | [72] | |
| 1681 | “A Person of Honour” | [74] | |
| 1693 | Sir Charles Sedley | [75] | |
| THE SECOND PERIOD | |||
| 1709 | Sir Richard Steele | [76] | |
| 1709 | Nicholas Rowe | [78] | |
| 1711 | Elijah Fenton | [80] | |
| 1712 | John Dennis | [82] | |
| 1712 | Edward Young | [83] | |
| 1714 | Joseph Addison | [84] | |
| 1725 | Alexander Pope | [85] | |
| 1727 | James Thomson | [88] | |
| 1733 | Lewis Theobald | [89] | |
| 1740 | Joseph Warton | [91] | |
| 1743 | William Collins | [92] | |
| 1744 | Sir Thomas Hanmer | [93] | |
| 1747 | Samuel Johnson | [94] | |
| 1747 | Bishop William Warburton | [95] | |
| 1751 | Christopher Smart | [96] | |
| 1754 | David Hume | [97] | |
| 1756 | Horace Walpole | [99] | |
| 1758 | John Armstrong | [100] | |
| 1759 | William Mason | [101] | |
| 1759 | Thomas Gray | [102] | |
| 1759 | David Mallet | [103] | |
| 1759 | Edward Young | [104] | |
| c. | 1760 | Mark Akenside | [105] |
| 1760 | Robert Lloyd | [106] | |
| 1760 | Edward Capell | [107] | |
| 1761 | Charles Churchill | [108] | |
| 1762 | William Whitehead | [109] | |
| 1763 | William Thompson | [110] | |
| 1765 | Samuel Johnson | [111] | |
| 1768 | George Keate | [112] | |
| 1769 | David Garrick | [113] | |
| 1769 | Anonymous | [116] | |
| 1774 | William Richardson | [117] | |
| 1775 | William Julius Mickle | [119] | |
| 1777 | William Hayley | [120] | |
| 1777 | Thomas Warton | [121] | |
| a. | 1782 | Anna Seward | [123] |
| 1794 | William Lisle Bowles | [124] | |
| THE THIRD PERIOD | |||
| 1802 | William Wordsworth | [127] | |
| 1804 | Felicia Dorothea Hemans | [128] | |
| 1814 | Sir Walter Scott | [129] | |
| 1817 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [130] | |
| 1817 | Francis, Lord Jeffrey | [133] | |
| 1818 | William Hazlitt | [135] | |
| c. | 1818 | John Keats | [138] |
| c. | 1818 | John Keats | [138] |
| 1819 | John Wilson | [140] | |
| 1824 | Charles Sprague | [142] | |
| 1824 | Charles Lamb | [144] | |
| 1827 | Julius Charles Hare | [145] | |
| 1831 | James Hogg | [146] | |
| 1833 | Charles Lamb | [148] | |
| 1833 | Hartley Coleridge | [149] | |
| 1838 | Thomas de Quincey | [150] | |
| 1839 | John Sterling | [153] | |
| 1839 | Henry Hallam | [155] | |
| 1840 | —— Johnstone | [156] | |
| 1840 | Thomas Carlyle | [157] | |
| 1841 | William Wordsworth | [159] | |
| 1843 | Lord Macaulay | [160] | |
| 1844 | Ralph Waldo Emerson | [162] | |
| 1850 | Frederick William Robertson | [164] | |
| 1851 | Leigh Hunt | [166] | |
| 1852 | James Anthony Froude | [167] | |
| 1853 | David Masson | [168] | |
| 1853 | Matthew Arnold | [169] | |
| 1853 | Walter Savage Landor | [170] | |
| 1858 | John Henry Newman | [171] | |
| c. | 1858 | James Russell Lowell | [173] |
| 1863 | Nathaniel Hawthorne | [175] | |
| 1864 | Bishop Charles Wordsworth | [176] | |
| 1864 | Oliver Wendell Holmes | [177] | |
| 1865 | Cardinal Wiseman | [179] | |
| 1865 | Archbishop Trench | [180] | |
| 1865 | Francis Turner Palgrave | [181] | |
| 1866 | Frances Anne Kemble | [183] | |
| 1868 | John Ruskin | [184] | |
| 1871 | Dante Gabriel Rossetti | [185] | |
| 1872 | Bayard Taylor | [186] | |
| 1874 | William Minto | [189] | |
| 1875 | Edward Dowden | [190] | |
| 1877 | George Meredith | [191] | |
| 1877 | Frederick James Furnivall | [192] | |
| 1878 | Walter Horatio Pater | [193] | |
| 1879 | Matthew Arnold | [195] | |
| ? c. | 1880 | Anonymous | [197] |
| 1880 | Algernon Charles Swinburne | [199] | |
| 1882 | Algernon Charles Swinburne | [201] | |
| 1883 | George Meredith | [202] | |
| 1884 | Robert Browning | [204] | |
| 1886 | William Wetmore Story | [205] | |
| 1886 | Thomas Spencer Baynes | [207] | |
| 1888 | Gerald Massey | [209] | |
| 1890 | Walt Whitman | [210] | |
| 1891 | Richard Watson Gilder | [212] | |
| c. | 1894 | Mathilde Blind | [213] |
| a. | 1892 | Alfred, Lord Tennyson | [214] |
| 1899 | Sidney Lee | [215] | |
| PART II | |||
| “GOOD SENTENCES” | |||
| 1639 | Anonymous | [219] | |
| 1681 | John Crowne | [220] | |
| 1737 | Alexander Pope | [221] | |
| 1745 | James Thomson | [222] | |
| 1767 | Anonymous | [223] | |
| a. | 1767 | George Colman | [224] |
| 1776 | Richard Graves | [225] | |
| 1778 | Horace Walpole | [226] | |
| 1787 | Daniel Webb | [227] | |
| 1801 | William Lisle Bowles | [228] | |
| 1807 | Felicia Dorothea Hemans | [229] | |
| 1811 | Francis, Lord Jeffrey | [230] | |
| 1811 | George Dyer | [231] | |
| 1812 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [232] | |
| 1813 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [232] | |
| 1817 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [232] | |
| 1817 | Leigh Hunt | [233] | |
| 1818 | William Hazlitt | [234] | |
| 1818 | Percy Bysshe Shelley | [235] | |
| 1819 | John Keats | [236] | |
| 1821 | William Hazlitt | [237] | |
| 1821 | Robert Southey | [238] | |
| 1821 | Lord Byron | [239] | |
| 1822 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [240] | |
| 1827 | Thomas Hood | [241] | |
| 1828 | Thomas Carlyle | [242] | |
| 1830 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [243] | |
| 1830 | Anonymous | [244] | |
| 1831 | Lord Macaulay | [245] | |
| 1834 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [246] | |
| 1836 | Samuel Taylor Coleridge | [246] | |
| 1837 | Leigh Hunt | [247] | |
| 1838 | Thomas de Quincey | [248] | |
| 1839 | Thomas de Quincey | [248] | |
| 1839 | Thomas Carlyle | [249] | |
| 1844 | Leigh Hunt | [250] | |
| 1844 | Ralph Waldo Emerson | [251] | |
| 1844 | Elizabeth Barrett Browning | [252] | |
| a. | 1846 | Walter Savage Landor | [253] |
| 1847 | Thomas de Quincey | [254] | |
| 1850 | Robert Browning | [255] | |
| a. | 1850 | William Wordsworth | [256] |
| a. | 1851 | David Macbeth Moir | [257] |
| 1851 | Thomas Lovell Beddoes | [258] | |
| 1853 | Edward Bulwer, Lord Lytton | [259] | |
| 1857 | Charles Mackay | [260] | |
| c. | 1860 | Abraham Lincoln | [261] |
| 1860 | Ralph Waldo Emerson | [262] | |
| 1865 | Cardinal Wiseman | [263] | |
| 1867 | Thomas Carlyle | [264] | |
| 1867 | Matthew Arnold | [265] | |
| 1870 | James Russell Lowell | [266] | |
| 1875 | Edward Dowden | [267] | |
| 1879 | Matthew Arnold | [268] | |
| 1882 | Dante Gabriel Rossetti | [269] | |
| 1884 | William Watson | [270] | |
| 1893 | Richard Green Moulton | [271] | |
| 1894 | Sir John Robert Seeley | [272] | |
| 1896 | John Ruskin | [273] | |
| PART III | |||
| “ROUND ABOUT” | |||
| 1664 | Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle | [277] | |
| 1711 | Joseph Addison | [278] | |
| 1743 | Henry Fielding | [279] | |
| 1747 | Thomas Edwards | [281] | |
| 1749 | Mark Akenside | [284] | |
| 1751 | Robert Lloyd | [288] | |
| 1765 | Oliver Goldsmith | [291] | |
| 1765 | George, Lord Lyttelton | [292] | |
| 1768 | Laurence Sterne | [295] | |
| 1769 | Anonymous | [298] | |
| 1769 | Isaac Bickerstaff | [299] | |
| 1778 | Anonymous | [302] | |
| 1788 | Horace Walpole | [305] | |
| 1790 | Paul Whitehead | [306] | |
| 1812 | William Combe | [308] | |
| 1826 | Charles Lamb | [313] | |
| 1845 | Nathaniel Hawthorne | [314] | |
| 1846 | Walter Savage Landor | [316] | |
| 1868 | William Schwenck Gilbert | [318] | |
| 1872 | Oliver Wendell Holmes | [323] | |
| 1897 | Theodore Watts-Dunton | [325] | |
| 1902 | Judge Willis | [326] | |
| To My Very Good Friend, Mr William Shakespeare | [329] | ||
| INDEX | [331] | ||
SOME NOTES ON SHAKESPEARE’S REPUTATION
I
INTRODUCTORY
This book provides a chronological sequence of the best pieces in verse and prose which the best writers in successive periods have written in praise of Shakespeare, and thereby aims at presenting, as it were, an index to the standard of estimation in which Shakespeare has been held at any given point of time. Thus, as an anthology, it differs in various respects from other anthologies. An anthology, as a rule, hopes to confine itself to pieces of literature intrinsically valuable. The conscientious compiler of an ordinary anthology includes nothing which, according to his own canons of taste, can be considered of doubtful merit. His choice may not always be approved by others—it frequently is not; but he, at least, is satisfied. Here, however, is a different case. My object has been to collect what may be called materials for a history of opinion of Shakespeare, so that as many years
as might be of the three centuries and more, which have elapsed since Shakespeare’s reputation was born, had to be represented. With these conditions it has not always been possible to exclude bad pieces, for the obvious reason that there has been at times a dearth of good writers. In such cases the best has been given that could be found. The best has at times been deplorably mediocre, but the scheme was inexorable.
The labour of selection has been guided by one or two principles. In the first place, complete poems, or extracts in verse and prose, which relate solely to Shakespeare have been taken in preference to those which mention him in company with his contemporaries. Secondly, passages that exhibit unusual characteristics, whether good or bad, have frequently been chosen. For some of the poor pieces, and I hope they are not many, something may be said. Though their writers are practically forgotten to-day, they were considered great during their own lives; so their productions have at least a historical value. If, then, this volume includes, as I think it does, the best things that have been written about Shakespeare, it includes also many things that in a comparative estimate of the whole must be considered as second-rate, though they happened to be the best in the period during which they were produced. The distinctiveness of the book may perhaps be indicated in this way. An ordinary anthology may be said to gather into a garland the choicest flowers from various fields of literature; this anthology claims to be little more than a collection of botanical specimens.