Astonishment is sometimes proof of a weak mind.
NORTH.
There seem to be two Common Senses. Goldsmith appears to be viewed as an eminent case of wanting it, in conduct—the practical—for his own use. But the theoretical—for judging others—imaginary cases—characterises that immortal work, The Vicar of Wakefield: and the theoretical, for judging other men real, existing, and known, his Retaliation. The criticism of Burke, for instance, is all exalted Common Sense—
"Who, born for the Universe, narrowed his mind,
And to Party gave up what was meant for Mankind."
That is the larger grasp of common Sense rising into high Sense.
"And thought of convincing while they thought of dining"
is its homelier scope.
SEWARD.
Common Sense is the lower part of complete Good Sense. Shakspeare and Phidias must use Good Sense in governing their whole composition; which Common Sense could not reach; and a man might have good sense in composing a group in marble, yet want it in governing his family. But Phidias executing a Venus with a blunt notched chisel, would want Common Sense.