| ∂q | = | ∂Q | ∂p | and | ∂q | = | ∂Q | ∂p | + | ∂Q | ; |
| ∂x | ∂p | ∂x | ∂y | ∂p | ∂y | ∂y |
these give
| ∂p | ∂q | − | ∂p | ∂q | = | ∂p | ∂Q | ; |
| ∂x | ∂y | ∂y | ∂x | ∂x | ∂y |
by hypothesis ∂p/∂x is not identically zero; therefore if the Jacobian determinant of p and q in regard to x and y is zero identically, so is ∂Q/∂y, or Q does not contain y, so that q is expressible as a function of p only. Conversely, such an expression can be seen at once to make the Jacobian of p and q vanish identically.
Passing now to the case of three variables, suppose that the Jacobian determinant of the three functions F, u, v in regard to x, y, z is identically zero. We prove that if u, v are not themselves functionally connected, F is expressible as a function of u and v. Suppose first that the minors of the elements of ∂F/∂x, ∂F/∂y, ∂F/∂z in the determinant are all identically zero, namely the three determinants such as
| ∂u | ∂v | − | ∂u | ∂v | ; |
| ∂y | ∂z | ∂z | ∂y |
then by the case of two variables considered above there exist three functional relations. ψ1(u, v, x) = 0, ψ2(u, v, y) = 0, ψ3(u, v, z) = 0, of which the first, for example, follows from the vanishing of
| ∂u | ∂v | − | ∂u | ∂v | . |
| ∂y | ∂z | ∂z | ∂y |
We cannot assume that x is absent from ψ1, or y from ψ2, or z from ψ3; but conversely we cannot simultaneously have x entering in ψ1, and y in ψ2, and z in ψ3, or else by elimination of u and v from the three equations ψ1 = 0, ψ2 = 0, ψ3 = 0, we should find a necessary relation connecting the three independent quantities x, y, z; which is absurd. Thus when the three minors of ∂F/∂x, ∂F/∂y, ∂F/∂z in the Jacobian determinant are all zero, there exists a functional relation connecting u and v only. Suppose no such relation to exist; we can then suppose, for example, that
| ∂u | ∂v | − | ∂u | ∂v |
| ∂y | ∂z | ∂z | ∂y |