Values of Index of Velocity.

Surface of Pipe. Authority. Diameter
of Pipe
in Metres.
Values of n.
Tin plate Bossut .036 1.697 1.72
.054 1.730
Wrought iron (gas pipe) Hamilton Smith .0159 1.756 1.75
.0267 1.770
Lead Darcy .014 1.866 1.77
.027 1.755
.041 1.760
Clean brass Mair .036 1.795 1.795
Asphalted Hamilton Smith .0266 1.760 1.85
Lampe. .4185 1.850
W. W. Bonn .306 1.582
Stearns 1.219 1.880
Riveted wrought iron Hamilton Smith .2776 1.804 1.87
.3219 1.892
.3749 1.852
Wrought iron (gas pipe) Darcy .0122 1.900 1.87
.0266 1.899
.0395 1.838
New cast iron Darcy .0819 1.950 1.95
.137 1.923
.188 1.957
.50 1.950
Cleaned cast iron Darcy .0364 1.835 2.00
.0801 2.000
.2447 2.000
.397 2.07
Incrusted cast iron Darcy .0359 1.980 2.00
.0795 1.990
.2432 1.990

Fig. 83.

In 1886, Professor W. C. Unwin plotted logarithmically all the most trustworthy experiments on flow in pipes then available.[5] Fig. 83 gives one such plotting. The results of measuring the slopes of the lines drawn through the plotted points are given in the table.

It will be seen that the values of the index n range from 1.72 for the smoothest and cleanest surface, to 2.00 for the roughest. The numbers after the brackets are rounded off numbers.

The value of n having been thus determined, values of m/dx were next found and averaged for each pipe. These were again plotted logarithmically in order to find a value for x. The lines were not very regular, but in all cases the slope was greater than 1 to 1, so that the value of x must be greater than unity. The following table gives the results and a comparison of the value of x and Reynolds’s value 3 − n.

Kind of Pipe.n3 − nx
Tin plate1.721.281.100
Wrought iron (Smith)1.751.251.210
Asphalted pipes1.851.151.127
Wrought iron (Darcy)1.871.131.680
Riveted wrought iron1.871.131.390
New cast iron1.951.051.168
Cleaned cast iron2.001.001.168
Incrusted cast iron2.001.001.160

With the exception of the anomalous values for Darcy’s wrought-iron pipes, there is no great discrepancy between the values of x and 3 − n, but there is no appearance of relation in the two quantities. For the present it appears preferable to assume that x is independent of n.

It is now possible to obtain values of the third constant m, using the values found for n and x. The following table gives the results, the values of m being for metric measures.