[118] Cf. Mill, Autobiography, p. 159. “I grappled at once with the problem of Induction, postponing that of Reasoning.” Ib. p. 182 (when he is preoccupied with syllogism), “I could make nothing satisfactory of Induction at this time.”
[119] Autobiography, p. 181.
[120] The insight, for instance, of F. H. Bradley’s criticism, Principles of Logic, II. ii. 3, is somewhat dimmed by a lack of sympathy due to extreme difference in the point of view adopted.
[121] Bacon, Novum organum, i. 100.
[122] Russell’s Philosophy of Leibnitz, capp. 1-5.
[123] See especially remarks on the letter of M. Arnauld (Gerhardt’s edition of the philosophical works, ii. 37 sqq.).
[124] Gerhardt, vi. 612, quoted by Russell, loc. cit., p. 19.
[125] Ibid., ii. 62, Russell, p. 33.
[126] Spinoza, ed. van Vloten and Land, i. 46 (Ethica, i. 11).
[127] Nouveaux essais, iv. 2 § 9, 17 § 4 (Gerhardt v. 351, 460).