EDWARD GIBBON, FATHER AND SON.
Gibbon mentions in his Memoirs (edit. 1796, p. 18.), that in 1741 his father and Mr. Delmé successfully contested Southampton against Mr. Henly, subsequently Lord Chancellor, but that, after the dissolution in 1747, he was unable or unwilling to maintain another contest, and "the life of the senator expired in that dissolution." Not so the hopes of the senator, as will appear from the following extract from a letter, dated "Beriton, January 27, 1754:"
"I received the favour of your letter according to the time you promised. As Lord M—— has promised his own votes, I find there is nothing to be done: strange behaviour, sure! But there seems to be such infatuation upon this poor country, that even a good Catholic shall join with a Dissenter to rivet on her chains. There are several of the Independents would have me stand it out, but I would not on any account, for I find it would make great dissensions, and even several of Lord M——'s fagots and tenants would vote against him; and another thing, it would lessen him in the opinion of a great many people to have him making interest for the two present worthy candidates against me. I shall therefore, upon his account, give over all thoughts of standing; and I hope it may give me some little more credit and merit with him against another election, especially if you would be so good as to improve it for me."
The following is of far greater interest—full of character. How well it illustrates the paragraph in the Memoirs (pp. 82-3.):
"My stay at Beriton was always voluntary ... I never handled a gun, I seldom mounted a horse; and my philosophic walks were soon terminated by a shady bench, where I was long detained by the sedentary amusement of reading or meditation."
It appears however, by this letter, that on one occasion he trespassed on some neighbour's game preserves, and received a hint on the subject:
Beriton, Nov. 16, 1758.
Sir,
As I am extremely well convinced of your politeness, and your readiness to grant your neighbours any reasonable liberty with regard to country sports, so I should be very sorry if either myself or my servants had taken any improper ones.
I am no sportsman, Sir, and was as much tempted this morning by the beauty of the day and the pleasure of the ride as by the hopes of any sport. I went out, and, neither acquainted with the bounds of the manors nor your request to the neighbouring gentlemen, could only follow my groom where he led me. I quitted your manor the instant I received your message, without having killed anything in it. I assure you that you shall never have again the same subject of complaint. With regard to the liberty you are so good as to grant me for other sports, I return you my most humble thanks, but shall not make much use of it, as there are still in my father's manor more game than would satisfy so moderate a sportsman as myself.
My father would be extremely angry if his servants had destroyed any of your game; but they all assure him they have killed no one hare upon your liberties. As to pheasants, they have only killed one this season, and that in Inwood copse.
I am,
Sir,
Your obedient humble servant,
E. Gibbon, Junior.
E. G. F. S.
BOHN'S "ORDERICUS VITALIS."
In looking through the pages of Ordericus Vitalis, vol. ii. (Bohn's edition), I have noticed some trifling inaccuracies, to one or more of which you will perhaps suffer me to call the editor's attention through the medium of "N. & Q.," in case he be not already aware of them.
At p. 70. King William is described as offering the bishopric of Mans to "Samson, Bishop of Bayeux, his chaplain." So in the index to Histor. Anglic. circa tempus Conquestûs, &c., a Francisco Maseres, I find this passage of Vitalis referred to under the title of "Sanson Baiocensis episcopus."