W. H. P.

Wages in the last Century (Vol. iii., p. 143.).—I have a note on this subject which is at A. A.'s service, extracted from the Gentleman's Magazine for May 1732, vol. ii p. 771.:—

"Wages (Yearly) appointed by the Justices, A.D. 1732, to be taken by the Servants in the County of Kent.

£s.d.
Head Ploughman, Waggoner, or Seedsman800
His Mate400
Best Woman Servant300
Second Sort200
Second Ploughman600
His Mate300
Labourers by the Day, in Summer012
Ditto, in Winter010
County of Gloucester.
Head Servant in Husbandry500
Second Servant400
Driving Boy under 14 Years100
Head Maid Servant in Dairy, and Cook2 100
Second Maid Servant200
Mower in Hay Harvest, without Drink,
per Day
012
With Drink, per Day010
Mower and Reaper in Corn Harvest, with
Diet, per Day
010
Other Day labourer, from Corn to Hay
Harvest, with Drink only, per Day
008
With Diet, per Day004
Without Diet or Drink, per Day00 10
Carpenter, Wheelwright, and Mason, without
Drink, per Day
012
With Drink, per Day010."

I send the note as I have it in my commonplace book; but I should think that the periodical from which the above is extracted, contains much that would suit A. A.'s purpose.

E. S. Taylor.

Martham, Norfolk.

Tradesmen's Signs (Vol. iii., p. 224.).—The projecting signs over tradesmen's shop-doors were removed under the London Paving Act, 6 Geo. III. c. 26. s. 17. In the Percy History of London, i. 179., the act is erroneously said to have been passed in 1762. From Malcolm's Anecdotes of London, pp. 468, 469., it seems that the clause in question was inserted in the act in consequence of inquiries by a committee appointed by the Court of Common Council in 1764. Mr. Peter Cunningham, in the "London Occurrences" prefixed to his Handbook for London, says: "1766. The house-signs of London taken down."

No doubt the existing Metropolitan Paving Acts contain clauses which will prevent tradesmen from again putting up projecting signs.