Now the motion of the luminiferous ether relatively to the spherule gives rise to the same effect as would an opposite motion impressed upon the spherule quite independently by an independent force. So you may think of the blue color coming from the sky as being produced by to and fro vibrations of matter in the air, which vibrates much as this little globe vibrates embedded in the jelly.

The result in a general way is this: The light coming from the blue sky is polarized in a plane through the sun, but the blue light of the sky is complicated by a great number of circumstances, and one of them is this: that the air is illuminated not only by the sun, but by the earth. If we could get the earth covered by a black cloth, then we could study the polarized light of the sky with simplicity, which we cannot do now. There are, in nature, reflections from seas, and rocks, and hills, and waters in an indefinitely complicated manner.

Let observers observe the blue sky not only in winter, when the earth is covered with snow, but in summer, when it is covered with dark green foliage. This will help to unravel the complicated phenomena in question. But the azure blue of the sky is light produced by the reaction on the vibrating ether of little spherules of water, of perhaps a fifty-thousandth or a hundred-thousandth of a centimeter diameter, or perhaps little motes, or lumps, or crystals of common salt, or particles of dust, or germs of vegetable or animal species wafted about in the air. Now what is the luminiferous ether? It is matter prodigiously less dense than air, millions and millions and millions of times less dense than air. We can form some sort of idea of its limitations. We believe it is a real thing, with great rigidity in comparison with its density, and it may be made to vibrate 400 million million times per second, and yet with such rigidity as not to produce the slightest resistance to any body going through it.

Going back to the illustration of the shoemaker's wax; if a cork will in the course of a year push its way up through a plate of that wax when placed under water, and if a lead bullet will penetrate downward to the bottom, what is the law of the resistance? It clearly depends on time. The cork slowly in the course of a year works its way up through two inches of that substance; give it one or two thousand years to do it, and the resistance will be enormously less; thus the motion of a cork or bullet, at the rate of one inch in 2,000 years, may be compared with that of the earth, moving at the rate of six times ninety-three million miles a year, or nineteen miles per second, through the luminiferous ether, but when we have a thing elastic like jelly and yielding like pitch, surely we have a large and solid ground for our faith in the speculative hypothesis of an elastic luminiferous ether, which constitutes the wave theory of light.


THE LIMITATIONS OF SUBMARINE TELEGRAPHY.[8]

The weight of the conductors, says Henry Vivarez in La Lumiere Electrique, plays an important part in submarine telegraphy, not merely as a heavy item in the outlay, but as one of the principal factors in laying down the lines, and in taking them up in case of damage. When the conductor is being raised, the grappling-irons which lift it have to resist not merely the vertical component of the weight of the cable, but also the considerable effects resulting from friction against the water. It thus frequently happens, when working at great depths, that the conductor may be exposed to a strain greater than it is able to bear, and we are forced to have recourse to stratagems to bring it to the surface. These artifices consist in the use of two or more ships in raising, which is done as shown in Figs. 2 and 3, or, in the most simple cases, with the aid of an auxiliary buoy, as in Fig. 4. In any event, we see that the difficulties, and of course the cost of raising, must be considerable.

Fig. 1.

Hence to decrease the weight of the cables would be an important step in advance. If the weight is in general very great, it is because the copper core does not take any part in the strain which the entire cable has to resist. We know, indeed, that copper cannot bear a breaking-strain greater, at most, than 28 kilos per square millimeter. Besides, it would be elongated by such a strain by a very considerable fraction of its initial length; and, if the core were made to take part in any manner whatever in the strain which the entire cable has to support, it would be drawn out beyond its limit of elasticity, and would remain permanently elongated, while the substances in which it is inclosed would return to their natural length. It would result that, being no longer able to find room in a sheath which had become too short, the copper wire would take a sinuous form in its gutta-percha envelope, and would occasion at certain points ruptures, the effect of which would be to decentralize the wire, to perforate the layer of insulating matter, and finally to open out a fault in the cable.