Before the introduction of automatic sprinklers there was not, I believe, a single instance of a fire entering the lower portion of a belt tower during working hours without accomplishing the destruction of the mill. Since the equipment of such places with automatic sprinklers, there have been several fires of this nature extinguished with nearly nominal damage. That is to say, the hazard of fire starting in such places is beyond the capacity of any apparatus other than automatic sprinklers to cope with it.
It would be impossible to arrange the distribution of power in many mills to conform to conditions of safety without reorganizing the whole plant, which would, of course, be impracticable. But in many instances modifications can be introduced which will diminish the hazard to a great degree. When the pulleys and belting are covered with sheathing in each room, the continuity of these flues can be broken by removing this sheathing down to the height of four or five feet above the floor, so that the covering will merely constitute a physical protection to any one approaching the belting.
The best method of arranging the belt tower has been in the case of a mill at Fall River, which was erected upon the ruins of a building destroyed by a fire originating in the belt tower. The machinery is driven by a steam engine situated in an ell projecting from one side at about the middle of the mill; and the main belt communicates to pulleys in a stone masonry
tower located directly inside the walls of the main mill; and thence, from pulley to pulley, the power is communicated to each floor by shafting passing through holes left in the tower, and in no instances by means of belts.
There is a separate stairway inside of the tower for lubricating the journals, etc., and the top of the tower is covered with skylights protected underneath by a wire netting. In case of a fire in the belt tower, the heat will readily break the glass at the top, and the fire will tend to go up and out of the tower rather than through the mill.
MILL FLOORS.
The questions involved in designing the floors of a mill are of great importance, contributing in no small measure to elements concerned in the successful operation of the mill, and to a greater extent to its standing as a fire risk, and therefore affecting the constant expense of insurance.
In the case of a building designed merely for sustaining of loads, as in a storehouse, a floor would naturally be designed on the basis of considering the breaking strength of the timber. But in the case of a mill, the limitation is the amount of flexure allowable under the circumstances; and therefore the floors of the building are made more nearly rigid than would be required merely from the consideration of the ultimate strength of the structure.
The books on the subject, repeating over a constant which was first, I believe, given by Brunel in testimony before a parliamentary commission, have held that one four-hundredth of a span is the proper ratio of flexure. This may have been a very good rule to give to the parliamentary commission, but it is hardly the practical method of limitation for a matter of engineering construction, because the flexure of a loaded beam is in the form of a curve, and therefore its law is that of a curvilinear function, and not of a straight line. I have examined a great number of precedents of good construction in this connection, and for mill use have deduced the formula for deflection in inches, d = 0.0012 L², in which L is the length of span in feet. It will be readily recognized that the true constant of deflection of span is measured by the radius of curvature which will give a uniform and allowable distortion to the floor in either direction to the limit of the radius upon which this formula is based, which is 1,250 feet.
I do not propose to offer to you on this occasion any remarks in regard to the treatment of the mathematics of the problem of applied mechanics concerned in the questions of transverse stress, knowing that you have certainly received instruction upon these subjects. But referring to the questions of mill floors, I would state that Southern pine beams of solid timber twelve by fourteen up to fourteen by sixteen inches are used; and instead of attempting the use of one piece of timber, it is preferable to use two pieces of the same depth and of half the breadth. These should be bolted together, with a space of an inch or so between them left by placing small vertical pieces of wood between the timbers when they are bolted together. In this manner one is more sure of sound timber, and in the process of seasoning there is less liability of dry rot in the interior, or of injurious checking, warping, or twisting.