—General Crook is reported to have said, recently, to a newspaper man, “It is hard to be forced to kill the Indians when they are clearly in the right.”
—The question of Indian loyalty or revolt is generally decided by our treatment of them. If served by capable and faithful agents, supplied according to agreement, and protected from whiskey-dealing traders, they are peaceable and friendly. If defrauded of their rights, starved, and driven from place to place, they become “bad Indians,” and who wouldn’t? Witness the contrast between the Piutes and Shoshones, of Nevada, and the Bannocks.
—The Bannock war would seem to be nearly over. An official report announces that the Bannocks and Piutes have separated, and are fleeing, apparently towards their reservations or former haunts. Wheaton, and the boats on the Columbia, with Bernard and Forsythe pressing from other points, all under the direction of General Howard, who also operated separately with a small force of cavalry, prevented the intended crossing of the Columbia, and an escape into Washington Territory and the British Provinces. Settlers in the vicinity of Camas Prairie are now in terror from the returning Bannocks. Well they may be. The war began in connection with an attempt of these Indians to go back from their Fort Hall reservation, when nearly starved, to dig the camas, a nutritious root, from which that region is named. The white inhabitants objected, as they wanted the roots for their hogs. A difficulty arose, a white man was killed, the military was called upon, and, though the tribe did not justify the killing, nor shield the murderer, yet proceeded to inflict punishment upon the whole tribe by taking their horses and guns—largely their dependence for subsistence.—Advance.
—The President is said to be making careful inquiries into the facts as to the immigration of Chinamen to our Pacific Coast, and to purpose a special message to the next Congress on the subject. He has been reported as favoring its limitation by modification of the Burlingame treaty.
—On the 19th of July, Judge Belden, of the District Court, rendered a decision important to the interests of Chinese labor on the Pacific Coast, declaring the exorbitant license tax on Chinese laundries, of twenty dollars a month, to be void, and payments made recoverable, on the ground that such charges were excessive, disproportionate, and derogatory to fundamental principles of just government.
—Twenty-five Chinese laborers sailed July 19th for Peru, to work on a sugar estate. They are guaranteed prompt payment of sixteen dollars a month, and good treatment. Others will probably follow them.
—Judge Choate, of the United States District Court, ruled, July 10th, that a Chinaman cannot be naturalized under the laws of the United States. The application was made by a Chinaman known as Charles Miller, who has lived in New York for twenty-eight years. Judge Choate was guided by the decision of Judge Sawyer, of California, in the Ah Yup case, when thirteen hundred Chinamen petitioned that schools might be provided for them, as for Indians and negroes, and showed that in San Francisco alone they were paying $42,000 in school taxes. Their request was not granted, although it merely asked the carrying out of a provision of the State Constitution which the honorable gentleman had sworn to obey.
—Colonel F. A. Bee, attorney for the Chinese six companies, declares, upon official records, that during the past two years, up to June 1, the emigration and death-rate of the Chinese have exceeded the immigration by about 500; and that the entire number of Chinese residents on the Pacific Coast, as shown on the registers of the six companies, does not exceed 65,000.