+ + + Dial. 40: 194. Mr. 16, ’06. 1440w.
“Taken for what it professes to be, this book is of eminent value, but since each chapter was written within a short time after the battle it narrates ... the historian of the future, with the official records at his command, will doubtless find in it many errors of detail.”
+ + – Ind. 60: 516. Mr. 1, ’06. 300w.
“As a contribution to the literature of scientific warfare the volume is of high value. We cannot commend it as a narrative of the particular war under review, for it retains altogether too much of the speculative comment of the original, so interesting at the time, but so tedious after the event.”
+ – Lit. D. 32: 172. F. 3, ’06. 90w.
“Embellished as they now are by an admirable series of maps, they form by far the most scientific study of the war that has yet been published. It is, however, unfortunate that the spelling of names in the letterpress should not have been brought into accord with that adopted by the map maker.”
+ + – Lond. Times. 4: 353. O. 27, ’05. 2880w.
“This book contains many remarks on matters of strategy and military science that are of permanent value.”
+ – Nation. 82: 79. Ja. 25, ’06. 130w.
“Apart from its technical interest, it is noteworthy as showing how well its author could prophesy.”