“Faults it has in abundance—big, obtrusive, exasperating faults. It is a book well worth reading.” Edward Clark Marsh.
+ – Bookm. 24: 274. N. ’06. 950w.
“Is as vivid in literary force as ‘Red pottage,’ and is more wholesome in tone. It is the work of an artist, not a vivisectionist.”
+ + – Canadian M. 24: 86. N. ’06. 410w.
“The author makes herself the peer for a page or two with the writers of the best literature in the ... tribute to a certain class of dull, enduring Englishmen.”
+ – Ind. 61: 1288. N. 29, ’06. 660w.
“The story is not without dramatic chapters. In spite of literary defects it often holds the interest of the reader effectively.”
+ – Lit. D. 33: 685. N. 10, ’06. 160w.
“Some of the deeper things in human nature are cleverly touched and their fountain sources stirred.”
+ Lit. D. 33: 857. D. 8, ’06. 70w.