+ + – Ath. 1906, 1: 205. F. 17. 2960w. (Review of v. 3 and 4.) + + Ath. 1906, 1: 705. Je. 9. 2030w. (Review of v. 5.)
“We have noticed a good many slight slips, which are probably the fault, not of Mr. Graves, but of the compiler of the original catalogues.”
+ + – Ath. 1906, 2: 79. Jl. 21. 1730w. (Review of v. 6.)
“As a work of reference for the historian, whether dealing with the Academy or with any one of a tremendous company of artists, this handsomely printed compilation commends the warmest praise.” Royal Cortissoz.
+ + Atlan. 97: 273. F. ’06. 230w. (Review of v. 1 and 2.)
“Every page, indeed, bears witness to the painstaking accuracy with which the thousands of references have been extracted from the records.”
+ + Int. Studio. 28: 276. My. ’06. 60w. (Review of v. 2–4.)
“We have said enough to indicate the curious interest of these laborious volumes. Much might have been added, both as to the earlier and the modern men.”
+ + – Lond. Times. 5: 66. F. 23, ’06. 1480w.
“Has all the interest of the first.”