+ + – Am. Hist. R. 11: 394 Ja. ’06. 2180w. (Review of v. 3.)
“Mr. Greene has handled his problem with the grasp of a true historical artisan, and his book is a definite contribution to American history.” Carl Russell Fish.
+ + + |Am. Hist. R. 11: 411. Ja. ’06. 1310w. (Review of v. 6.)
“In regard to style it must be pronounced very defective. Summing up one is obliged to say that, while the book shows industry and knowledge, its faults in regard both to style and to accuracy are so numerous as to make it hardly worthy of the high reputation of its author.” George M. Wrong.
+ – – Am. Hist. R. 11: 413. Ja. ’06. 1580w. (Review of v. 7.)
“It may be doubted whether either volume adds much to the thoroughly exploited facts in its respective field.” H. A. C.
+ Am. Hist. R. 11: 907. Jl. ’06. 1270w. (Review of v. 8 and 9.)
“More exact dates would be in some of the chapters desirable. The volume is quite worthy of recognition as a model history of the time.” Austin Scott.
+ + –|Am. Hist. R. 11: 916. Jl. ’06. 1910w. (Review of v. 10.)
“The book itself is so sanely written that it seems ungrateful to call attention to what are very small defects.” Worthington Chauncey Ford.