+ + – Eng. Hist. R. 21: 566. Jl. ’06. 740w. (Review of v. 2.)
“Dr. Hodgkin has made the best of a not very favourable situation, and given us a book distinguished by all the engaging qualities that have procured so extensive an audience for his earlier works.” Gaillard Thomas Lapsley.
+ + Eng. Hist. R. 21: 755. O. ’06. 1180w. (Review of v. 1.)
“With American social and economic conditions of the Revolutionary era Mr. Hunt displays but a poor acquaintance.”
+ + – Ind. 60: 984. Ap. 26, ’06. 1230w. (Review of v. 1–3 and 10.)
“Working within his limitations Dr. Brodrick achieved success.”
+ + – Ind. 61: 334. Ag. 9, ’06. 470w. (Review of v. 11.)
“The editors would have been wiser if they had permitted the writer of the volume to deal with matters outside the general scope of their series. Uniformity of scheme is uniformly mischievous in all such cases. We have laid stress on this weakness of the book, because it seems to us fundamental.”
+ + – Lond. Times. 5: 50. F. 16, ’06. 800w. (Review of v. 2.)
“Of political organization he tells us surprisingly little. Dr. Hodgkin has performed so well what he endeavored to perform that we hardly ought to complain of his not having done something else.”