“Mr. Joachim’s essay is an examination of three typical notions as to what truth is, and will be found most direct of all recent attempts to answer Pilate’s question.”
+ + Ath. 1906, 2: 96. Jl. 28. 700w.
“In view of the fundamental value of Mr. Joachim’s work it seems ungracious to allude to secondary blemishes. But it is not easy reading, and the author has provided no analysis of argument and only a scanty index.” F. C. S. Schiller.
+ + – J. Philos. 3: 54. S. 27, ’06. 3520w.
“His book as a whole shows the possession of the philosophic temper in a high degree, and its conclusions are the more valuable because they are so carefully and moderately expressed.”
+ + – Lond. Times. 5: 303. S. 7, ’06. 2140w.
“Up to a point. Mr. Joachim’s work fulfills our expectations. The trouble is that, at the end of it all, Mr. Joachim has to confess himself beaten. His notion of truth will not work out, and leaves him with only negative results, hoping against hope to escape from skepticism.”
– + Nation. 83: 42. Jl. 12, ’06. 1230w.
“It claims no positive result, but is an acute, though rather involved and at times scholastic criticism of three current conceptions of
+ + – Philos. R. 15: 658. N. ’06. 480w.