| + + − | Nation. 84: 502. My. 30, ’07. 670w. (Review of v. 20 and 21.) | |
| N. Y. Times. 12: 24. Ja. 12, ’07. 780w. (Review of v. 19.) |
“Mr. Hosmer succeeds in making [military matters] not only intelligible but interesting to the layman.”
| + + + | N. Y. Times. 12: 133. Mr. 2, ’07. 850w. (Review of v. 20.) |
“He has prepared a splendid bibliography in the final chapter on the authorities, the best in his period which exists.”
| + + + | N. Y. Times. 12: 482. Ag. 3, ’07. 220w. (Review of v. 21.) |
“The work is marked throughout by scholarship, sound judgment, and critical insight, and is the best short history of the subject with which we are acquainted.”
| + + + | N. Y. Times. 12: 549. S. 14, ’07. 770w. (Review of v. 22.) | |
| + + + | Outlook. 85: 93. Ja. 12, ’07. 320w. (Review of v. 18.) |
“As a narrative it is easy, compact, and lucid. The Admiral, it seems to us, is inclined to take an over-roseate view of Southern slavery, and a rather narrow one of the motives and conduct of those who lent comfort and aid to John Brown.”
| + + − | Outlook. 85: 332. F. 9, ’07. 220w. (Review of v. 19.) | |
| + + + | Outlook. 85: 764. Mr. 30, ’07. 340w. (Review of v. 20.) |
“His treatment of the assassination of Lincoln is distinctly inadequate.”