| + + − | Ind. 62: 1527. Je. 27, ’07. 780w. (Review of v. 4. and 5.) |
“Able and exhaustive book. It will be an unfailing resource of the student, while it proves the despair of the captious critic; for its author can never be found nodding, and he puts forward no plausible theories to serve as a target for the enemy’s bullets.”
| + + + | Lond. Times. 5: 50. F. 16, ’06. 850w. (Review of v. 3.) |
“The best history that has yet been written of the reigns of the first two Tudor princes. Whether he looks for instruction or for amusement, the reader who takes up Mr. Fisher’s book will not be disappointed.”
| + + | Lond. Times. 6: 21. Ja. 18, ’07. 2010w. (Review of v. 5.) |
“Within the limits thus prescribed for him, Mr. Montague has produced a model book, and if sometimes these limits seem irksome to the reader, they must have been more so to the writer.”
| + + − | Lond. Times. 6: 194. Je. 21, ’07. 1360w. (Review of v. 7.) | |
| + + | Nation. 84: 132. F. 7, ’07. 410w. (Review of v. 4 and 5.) |
“Although the high praise bestowed on this series in earlier notices must be continued yet as the volumes accumulate certain deep seated weaknesses begin to show more conspicuously.”
| + + − | Nation. 85: 146. Ag. 15, ’07. 720w. (Review of v. 7.) |
“His present work is authoritative, and based upon the results of the most recent scholarship. It is a valuable contribution to the literature of one of the most significant periods of English history.”