| + + | Pol. Sci. Q. 22: 188. Mr. ’07. 210w. (Review of v. 4.) |
“Unhappily the volume is marred in many places by vehement expressions and loose characterizations which seem unworthy of so dignified a work.” Charles A. Beard.
| + − | Pol. Sci. Q. 22: 522. S. ’07. 740w. (Review of v. 11.) |
“As a narrator ... he is admirable; his style is clear and, without striving after epigram, epigrammatic.”
| + − | Sat. R. 103: 559. My. 4, ’07. 1430w. (Review of v. 5.) |
“We must say, however, that Professor Montague’s flag is hoisted at once, and that there is scarcely an attempt to be fair to the side he does not like. We are not imputing to Mr. Montague any deliberate ‘suppressio veri.’ But his history has a particular focus. It proceeds on the assumption that one man may steal a horse while another may not look over the hedge.”
| + − | Sat. R. 104: 483. O. 19, ’07. 920w. (Review of v. 7.) |
“In style, judgment, and exhaustive knowledge of sources it leaves little to be desired.”
| + + + | Spec. 98: 1011. Je. 29, ’07. 490w. (Review of v. 5.) |
“A broad, accurate, restrained and scholarly book. Admirable in its reliance on this authority and objectivity of the records, it is, however, a book which will appeal to the scholar rather than to the general reader.” Chalfant Robinson.