| Am. Hist. R. 12: 625. Ap. ’07. 1050w. (Review of v. 3.) |
Reviewed by Franklin Johnson.
| Am. J. Theol. 11: 342. Ap. ’07. 100w. (Review of v. 2.) |
“The ripe work of a great scholar, acknowledged to be the greatest living authority in his field—the history of the inquisition.”
| + + | A. L. A. Bkl. 3: 45. F. ’07. (Review of v. 1 and 2.) |
“To say that he has written the best book on the subject is scarcely to convey an adequate idea of its merit, for there is really no book that deserves to be compared with it.”
| + + − | Ath. 1907, 1: 127. F. 2. 1280w. (Review of v. 1 and 2.) |
“Written in the impartial spirit characteristic of the author’s earlier publications, this is the crowning achievement in the career of the octogenarian who is generally recognized on the continent as second to no other American historian.”
| + + + | Ind. 62: 496. F. 28, ’07. 1130w. (Review of v. 1–3.) |
“No other work of the year approaches this in significance, altho in the general field of European history there have been some notable contributions.”