“Mr. Prentice’s excellent work has serious limitations which are doubtless the result of his close identity with certain large corporations whose activities may be more or less affected by the enforcement of the anti-trust act.” Emory R. Johnson.
| + + − | Ann. Am. Acad. 30: 186. Jl. ’07. 800w. |
“Apart from its interest to the lawyer and the lawmaker, the book is of value to all who are concerned with or are interested in the problems of government and economics.”
| + | Ind. 62: 273. Ja. 31, ’07. 950w. |
“On the whole, however, it must be said that the book’s place is as a readable partisan account of the development of a constitutional doctrine, and not as a serious contribution to the legal literature of the subject.” James Parker Hall.
| + − | J. Pol. Econ. 15: 238. Ap. ’07. 1680w. |
“For some students of constitutional theories they may have their interest; but to the elucidation of the practical questions now before the country they contribute substantially nothing.”
| − + | Nation. 84: 411. My. 2, ’07. 350w. |
“He writes like a lawyer, with close study of the precedents, and with no wandering from his text. The book is not large, but it is weighty, and calls for an answer. The subject cannot be allowed to drop until it is settled, and those wishing the latest word cannot afford to neglect Mr. Prentice’s discussion.” Edward A. Bradford.
| + | N. Y. Times. 12: 84. F. ’07. 1670w. |