Ann. Am. Acad. 29: 234. Ja. ’07. 600w.

Reviewed by W: J. White.

Charities. 17: 471. D. 15. ’06. 880w.

“As a whole the work appears to be scholarly. The organization of the material used is excellent. On the main point however—the validity of the author’s ethical theory and judgment—the economic student cannot of course pass judgment.” R. F. Hoxie.

+J. Pol. Econ. 15: 641. D. ’07. 280w.

“The writer of this book has brought together in clear and readable form most of the essential arguments which have been offered for his contention; and he has supplied to trade unions and advocates of advanced social legislation very telling arguments for their position.” Charles Richmond Henderson.

+Dial. 42: 288. My. 1, ’07. 370w.

Ryan, Marah Ellis. Indian love letters. **$1. McClurg.

7–10045.

The hopeless love of a high-minded Indian for a fair haired girl in the East chants its sorrow here. Pathos, despair, renunciation, never impersonal where love is concerned, all stalk by the side of this stalwart young Indian over the sand dunes of Arizona. It is the old, old story but is tempered and colored by the strain of Indian poetry that reflects innate worship of Nature.