| + + − | Hibbert J. 5: 938. Jl. ’07. 2320w. |
“Is largely controversial. Unfortunately only one side is given, so the effect is like listening to a man talking into a telephone. Our enjoyment of the author’s wit is often restrained by the question whether it is properly deserved.”
| − + | Ind. 62: 797. Ap. 4, ’07. 880w. |
“His criticism is always well worth reading. On the other hand, his own system contains not a few features which will give many pause.”
| + − | Nature. 76: 220. Jl. 4, ’07. 560w. |
“Yet with all his noble rage for concrete truth he is one of the must abstract of writers. This characteristic makes his latest work ... pretty stiff and not extravagantly fruitful reading.”
| − | N. Y. Times. 12: 348. Je. 1, ’07. 190w. |
“The finished and attractive literary style in which he presents the new humanism manifests its identity, notwithstanding difference, with the old.”
| + | Outlook. 86: 37. My. 4, ’07. 360w. |
“Not only is Dr. Schiller, as we infer, young himself, but he is also writing for the young.”