| − + | Acad. 72: 516. My. 25, ’07. 230w. |
“The author writes crisply, and with a skilful command of her chosen medium. Decidedly a creditable venture.”
| + | Ath. 1907, 1: 630. My. 25. 150w. |
Reviewed by Mary K. Ford.
| Bookm. 25: 522. Jl. ’07. 580w. |
“The interest of this fantastic tale is but moderate, which is chiefly due to the fact that the author takes her subject over-seriously, instead of frankly abandoning herself to its possibilities of comedy and dramatic effect.” Wm. M. Payne.
| − | Dial. 43: 64. Ag. 1, ’07. 440w. |
“Distinctly repulsive ending.”
| − | Ind. 63: 574. S. 5, ’07. 90w. |
“It has in fact, a hundred good qualities, which make it well worth reading. It has one defect which, in our opinion, prevents it from taking its place beside the ‘Village tragedy,’ or the best of modern fiction. Our objections to Mr. Woods’s book (against so able a book we have no scruples about urging objections) is that it falls between the two stools of fact and fancy.”