| + + | Ath. 1907, 1: 99. Ja. 26. 730w. |
“A work as unique as it is valuable, for a one-volume history of the colonies under the House of Hanover has, we believe, no mate.”
| + + − | Ind. 63: 98. Jl. 11, ’07. 520w. | |
| + | Ind. 63: 1232. N. 21, ’07. 20w. | |
| + + − | Lit. D. 34: 841. My. 25, ’07. 480w. | |
| + + − | Lond. Times. 6: 59. F. 22, ’07. 1060w. |
“It is evident that Mr. Doyle’s last volumes are no better than those that preceded them, and will do nothing to re-establish the reputation of his earlier work.”
| − + | Nation. 85: 399. O. 31, ’07. 1050w. |
Reviewed by Robert Livingston Schuyler.
| + − | N. Y. Times. 12: 444. Jl. 13, ’07. 1150w. | |
| + − | Outlook. 86: 969. Ag. 31, ’07. 390w. |
“His final volume is far more fragmentary and inadequate than any of its predecessors.”
| − | Pol. Sci. Q. 22: 506. S. ’07. 900w. |
“Mr. Doyle seems quite content to accept, without further investigation on his own part, what he finds ready to his hand in the books of American writers on colonial history, and has neglected much first-hand authority (or its equivalent) of which he should most certainly have known.”