| + + | Dial. 38: 18. Ja. 1, ‘05. 670w. (Review of first series.) |
“Both in his fine classical scholarship and in his carefully wrought sentences, Mr. More calls to mind the lamented Walter Pater, although the Oxford scholar’s reading and literary sympathies, wide as they were, strike one as less comprehensive than Mr. More’s.”
| + + | Dial. 39: 17. Jl. 1, ‘05. 490w. (Review of second series.) | |
| + + | Dial. 39: 277. N. 1, ‘05. 410w. (Review of third series.) |
“The second series of Mr. Paul Elmer More’s ‘Shelburne essays’ is likely to win the favor of book lovers in no less degree than its predecessor. Mr. More’s freedom from provincialism is manifest even in his style.” Herbert W. Horwill.
| + + | Forum. 37: 252. O. ‘05. 1320w. (Review of second series.) |
“If Mr. More is able to realize his ideal of the high calling of the critic he will eventually be able to exert an influence on American literature like that of Brunetiere on French.”
| + | Ind. 59: 1112. N. 9, ‘05. 460w. (Review of third series.) |
[*] “The Lafcadio Hearn and the Sainte-Beuve [essays] are, perhaps, the most remarkable for the depth and penetration of their analysis.”
| + | Ind. 59: 1163. N. 16, ‘05. 60w. (Review of second and third series.) |
“His is the criticism that takes infinite pains, dissects out every nerve.”