“Though written with the ability and impartiality of its predecessors, it is not so well proportioned.”

+ + —Ath. 1905, 2: 10. Jl. 1. 1050w. (Review of v. 3.)

“There is no reason to suppose that Mr. Paul could not have done better work, had he chosen.” Edward Fuller.

— —Bookm. 21: 608. Ag. ‘05. 840w. (Review of v. 3.)

“Here, much more than in the earlier volumes, he offers valuable characterizations of activities and of men not wholly concerned with the purely political field.” E. D. Adams.

+ + +Dial. 39: 90. Ag. 16, ‘05. 890w. (Review of v. 3.)

“Generally speaking, he has impartiality and insight, and his survey of a group of historic facts, more especially of a social or religious movement, is often just and penetrating.”

+ + —Ind. 59: 39. Jl. 6, ‘05. 680w. (Review of v. 1-3.)

“A most charming style. His book is exceedingly good reading.”

+ +N. Y. Times. 10: 291. My. 6, ‘05. 900w. (Review of v. 3.)
*+ +N. Y. Times. 10: 883. D. 9, ‘05. 290w. (Review of v. 4.)