| + + — | Ath. 1905, 1: 116. Ja. 28. 1670w. |
“It is a thorough-going essay, notable for its clarification of the master’s works. Her book has gusto; it is written with equal knowledge and enthusiasm. It is one of the best of those monographs to which I have referred as based on system and industry rather than on an original impulse.” Royal Cortissoz.
| + + | Atlan. 95: 277. F. ‘05. 540w. |
“The author has grasped the value of giving attention to the study of the artist’s works at the expense of vague surmises as to his biography.”
| + + | Critic. 46: 186. F. ‘05. 80w. |
“A scholarly and appreciative monograph of great importance.” George Breed Zug.
| + + | Dial. 38: 320. My. 1, ‘05. 890w. |
“Her book is altogether the best on Verrocchio that we have, in English at least.”
| + + + | Ind. 58: 1364. Je. 15, ‘05. 180w. | |
| + | Int. Studio. 25: sup. 16. Mr. ‘05. 100w. |
“Generally speaking, Maud Cruttwell’s work is sober and well informed. One may regret the vagueness of her general views. Few comprehensive works of recent years are as useful.”