“Where he fails, it is for lack of the supreme touch of art, not of the high and ardent intention.”

+Critic. 47: 284. S. ‘05. 450w.

“It is characteristic Gissing, but not good Gissing. His familiar effects are reproduced in a fainter form than of old, and there are no new effects indicating how, with further experiences of life, his talents would have developed.”

+ —Lond. Times. 4: 209. Je. 30, ‘05. 660w.

“Each character, however lightly touched, is true, true to a hair, stepping forth from the page a rounded, breathing figure. It is excellent in workmanship and large of vision.”

+ +N. Y. Times. 10: 487. Jl. 22, ‘05. 590w.

“Certainly it leaves one with a warmer personal feeling toward the author than did some of his earlier and abler books.”

+Outlook. 80: 644. Jl. 8, ‘05. 110w.

“Although not by any means the best of his books, shows no failure in power.”

+Sat. R. 100: 251. Ag. 19, ‘05. 600w.
+Spec. 95: 19. Jl. 1, ‘05. 750w.