In youth simple stream systems sunk in steep walled cañons are separated by broad areas of surface incompletely drained. In maturity complex stream systems extend branches up to every part of the surface; steep slopes, sharp divides, pyramidal peaks express the rapidity with which every portion of the surface is attacked.

In old age the gently rolling surface is traversed by many quiet flowing streams; the heights are gone, the profiles are rounded, the contours subdued. In the first emergence from the sea the courses of streams are determined by accidents of slope, it may be by folding of the rising surface into troughs and arches. During maturity the process of retrogressive erosion, by which a stream cuts back into the watershed of a less powerful opponent stream, adjusts the channels to the outcrops of soft rocks and leaves the harder strata as eminences. In old age this process of differential degradation is complete and only the hardest rocks maintain a slight relief.

Suppose that an aged surface of this character be revived: the rivers hitherto flowing quietly in broad plains will find their fall increased in their lower courses; their channels in soft rock will rapidly become cañons, and the revived phase will retreat up stream in the same manner that the cañons of youth extended back into the first uplifted mass. If the area of soft rocks be bounded by a considerable mass of very hard rocks, it is conceivable that a second phase of age, a base level, might creep over the valley while yet the summits of the first old age remained unattacked, and should perchance revival succeed revival the record of the last uplift might be read in sharp cut channels of the great rivers, while the forms of each preceding phase led like steps to the still surviving domes of that earliest old age.

Is there aught in these speculations to fit our facts? I think there is. We have seen that our mountains and valleys are the result of differential degradation, and that this is not only broadly true but true in detail also. This is evidence that streams have been long at work adjusting their channels, they have passed through the period of maturity.

We have climbed to the summits of the Unakas and found them composed of rocks as hard as those from which the pinnacle of the Matterhorn is chiseled; but we see them gently sloping, as a plain. These summits are very, very old.

We have recognized that dissected plain, the level of the Asheville amphitheatre, now 2,400 feet above the sea; it was a surface produced by subaerial erosion, and as such it is evidence of the fact that the French Broad River, and such of its tributaries as drain this area, at one time completed their work upon it, reached a base level. That they should have accomplished this the level of discharge of the sculpturing streams must have been constant during a long period, a condition which implies either that the fall from the Asheville plain to the ocean was then much less than it now is, or that through local causes the French Broad was held by a natural dam, where it cuts the Unaka chain.

If we should find that other rivers of this region have carved the forms of age upon the surfaces of their intermontane valleys, and there is now some evidence of this kind at hand, then we must appeal to the more general cause of base-levelling and accept the conclusion that the land stood lower in relation to the ocean than it now does. Furthermore, we have traversed the ravines which the streams have cut in this ancient plain and we may note on the accompanying atlas sheet that the branches extend back into every part of it; the ravines themselves prove that the level of discharge has been lowered, the streams have been revived; and the wide ramification of the brooks is the characteristic of approaching maturity.

We have also glanced at the topography of the valley and have found the rivers flowing in deep-cut simple channels which are young, and the smaller streams working on an undulating surface that is very sensitive to processes of degradation.

The minor stream systems are very intricate and apparently mature, but they have not yet destroyed the evidence of a general level to which the whole limestone area was once reduced, but which now is represented by many elevations that approach 1,600 feet above the sea. Here then in the valley are young river channels, mature stream systems and faint traces of an earlier base level, all of them more recent than the Asheville level, which is in turn less ancient than the dome-like summits of the Unakas.

What history can we read in these suggestive topographic forms and their relations?