Which report are you referring to?
DR. VON ROHRSCHEIDT: I was referring to the report of 14 November as far as I can see from my German translation. This report seems to have been drawn up by a delegation of English, Soviet, and American experts, and accompanied the report of 17 November 1945. What I quoted was the following—may I repeat:
“The ability of the Defendant Hess to defend himself, to face a witness, and to understand details of the evidence is impaired.”
I ask the Tribunal to tell me. . . .
THE PRESIDENT: Can you say which of the doctors you are quoting?
DR. VON ROHRSCHEIDT: It is the report which, in my copy, is dated 14 November 1945, and, as I said, was presumably signed by Soviet, American, and English doctors.
Unfortunately, when returning the material yesterday evening after translation into German I could not get the original text, and my attempt to obtain it now failed through lack of time.
THE PRESIDENT: Have the English prosecutors got a copy, and can you tell us which it is?
SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: I’m sorry, My Lord, I think I am in the same difficulties as your Lordship. On the order that I have, I have copies of four medical reports. Your Lordship will see at the end of the document headed “Order,” it says, “Copies of four medical reports are attached.”
The first one of these is signed by three English doctors on the 19th of November. The second is signed by three American doctors and a French doctor, dated the 20th of November 1945. And then there is a report signed by three Soviet doctors, dated the 17th of November. And one is signed by three Soviet doctors and the French doctor dated the 16th of November. These are the only ones which I have with the Court’s order.