The first application on behalf of the Defendant Von Schirach was for a witness Hans Marsalek to be produced for cross-examination, and that application is granted.
The second application was for interrogatories to a witness Kaufmann, and that is granted.
The next matter was an application on behalf of the Defendant Hess for five documents; and as to that, the Tribunal orders that two of the documents applied for under Heads B and D in Dr. Seidl’s application have already been published in the Reichsgesetzblatt, and one of them is already in evidence, and they will, therefore, be admitted.
The Tribunal considers that the documents applied for under Heads C and E of Dr. Seidl’s application are unsatisfactory and have no evidential value; and since it does not appear from Dr. Seidl’s application and the matters referred to therein that the alleged copies are copies of any original documents, the application is denied in respect thereof. But leave is granted to Dr. Seidl to file a further affidavit by Gaus covering his recollection of what was in the alleged agreements.
The application on behalf of the Defendant Funk for an affidavit by a witness called Kallus is granted.
The application on behalf of the Defendant Streicher is denied. The application on behalf of the Defendant Sauckel firstly for a witness named Biedermann is granted, and secondly for four documents; that application is also granted.
The application on behalf of the Defendant Seyss-Inquart for an interrogatory to Dr. Stuckart is granted.
The application on behalf of the Defendant Frick is granted for an interrogatory to a witness, Dr. Konrad.
The application on behalf of the Defendant Göring with reference to two witnesses is granted in the sense that the witnesses are to be alerted.
The application on behalf of the Defendants Hess and Frank for official information from the ministry of war of the United States of America is denied.