Are the facts correctly stated in this article?
VON NEURATH: If I had to investigate the correctness of every article written by some journalist or other, I would have had a lot to do. These statements are the opinion of a journalist and nothing more.
THE PRESIDENT: That was not the question. The question was whether they were correctly stated, as a matter of fact. You can answer that.
VON NEURATH: Yes—no.
THE PRESIDENT: Which do you mean, “yes” or “no”?
VON NEURATH: The decorations are correctly stated. Apart from that it is not correct.
MR. COUNSELLOR RAGINSKY: I have no further questions to put.
THE PRESIDENT: Dr. Lüdinghausen, do you wish to re-examine?
DR. VON LÜDINGHAUSEN: Mr. President, yesterday afternoon I had the feeling and impression, probably not without reason, that Herr Von Neurath was visibly tired and strained after the previous examination and that he was no longer in a position to do complete justice to the questions which were put to him. This, after all, is not surprising, if one considers that Herr Von Neurath is in his seventy-fourth year and besides that he is also suffering from a fairly serious heart disease. I feel obliged, therefore, to refer back to various points of the cross-examination of yesterday and put a few questions to him.
[Turning to the defendant.] Herr Von Neurath, you stated yesterday that because of the excesses of the SA and other radical groups in 1933 and later, you frequently protested to Hitler. What was the reason why you remonstrated with Hitler directly and did not raise your objections at the Cabinet meetings which were still taking place at that time?