THE PRESIDENT: Yes, we have just looked at it now.
COL. PHILLIMORE: Broadly speaking, it comes to this, that we are quite prepared to put in the whole proceedings, but we should object to extracts being put in; that is, amongst the affidavits and the evidence of some of the witnesses, material to support the points for which counsel for Defendant Dönitz contends. There is, on the other hand, a body of evidence the other way on all those points. That is why, My Lord...
THE PRESIDENT: Would it not save translation if you put in the passages in the document upon which you rely?
COL. PHILLIMORE: If that would be more convenient, My Lord, we can do that.
THE PRESIDENT: I do not know how long the document is. It may be very long indeed.
COL. PHILLIMORE: The whole proceedings are very long. The trial lasted for 4 days.
THE PRESIDENT: Then it would be appropriate that you should pick out the parts on which you rely and Dr. Kranzbühler can put in...
COL. PHILLIMORE: My Lord, it is put in the answer that the document against this defendant, which was proved in the defendant’s case, was an affidavit by the Judge Advocate, who set out the effect of the evidence accepted by the court.
THE PRESIDENT: The Tribunal follows that, but it thinks that it is desirable that you should put in the passages upon which you as well as the defense counsel rely.
FLOTTENRICHTER KRANZBÜHLER: May I submit this document, Mr. President?