THE PRESIDENT: And that application was made after the 3 July? No, I see that is wrong. It was submitted before, but it was not mentioned on 3 July.
DR. SERVATIUS: Mr. President, it was an application to bring the witness here from England, since presumably he can give information regarding a number of things. I have not yet made a formal application. It was just a request to have him brought from England to Nuremberg for the purpose of finding out whether he knows anything of importance, as he claims.
SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: My Lord, I would not make objection to the defendant’s son being brought here for the purpose of Dr. Servatius’ having a talk with him and seeing whether he can contribute anything.
THE PRESIDENT: The difficulty that these sorts of applications put the Tribunal in is that the case never closes.
SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Yes, My Lord, I quite agree.
DR. SERVATIUS: I did not know that the witness was in England. He was a prisoner and there had been no news about him previously.
THE PRESIDENT: Then, Sir David, do we have an affidavit from the Defendant Sauckel himself which you have already dealt with?
SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Yes, My Lord.
THE PRESIDENT: Then there is an affidavit by the Defendant Jodl on behalf of Kaltenbrunner; the application has been received at the General Secretary’s office on 5 July.
SIR DAVID MAXWELL-FYFE: Yes, My Lord.