I. The present laws are not satisfactory.
II. We do not need all the immigrants now coming to us.
III. Immigration (under the present system) is a detriment to the country.
This analysis should be the result of a thorough study of both sides of the whole proposition. If the task has been well done no change in the essential elements of the analysis will become necessary. However, as the investigation of the subject progresses, and the work of collecting evidence leads the student into a more intimate acquaintance with the proposition, it may be found advisable to make some alterations in the analysis first written out. Such alterations should be made only after careful deliberation, for it often happens that, in investigating a subject at close range, one loses the broad general view which is necessary to an intelligent analysis. It may even become necessary for a beginner to change his entire plan after he has made a more thorough investigation of the subject. In such an event the work originally spent in analysis should not be regarded as lost, because it is absolutely necessary that the student have some definite plan as a basis for his investigation. If it does no more than show him that he is wrong, the time spent on it cannot be said to be wasted. In any event, the student should keep his mind open for the reception of ideas which will make his analysis clearer, briefer, and more forcible.
Exercises in Analysis
1. Write out a complete analysis of one of the local questions phrased for Exercise 1, Chapter II.
2. Show the importance of the origin and history of the question in the analysis of each of the following propositions:
(1) Three-fourths of a jury should be competent to render a verdict in all criminal cases.
(2) Public libraries should be open on Sundays.
(3) The growth of large fortunes should be checked by a graduated income tax.