[288] The mediæval practice seems to have been that which still prevails in the Roman Catholic Church—to presume the doctrinal orthodoxy and external conformity of every citizen, whether lay or clerical, until the contrary be proved. Of course when heresy was rife it went hard with suspected men, unless they could either clear themselves or submit to recant. But no one was required to pledge himself beforehand, as a qualification for any office, to certain doctrines. And thus, important as an Emperor's orthodoxy was, he does not appear to have been subjected to any test, although the Pope pretended to the right of catechizing him in the faith and rejecting him if unsound. In the Ordo Romanus we find a long series of questions which the Pontiff was to administer, but it does not appear, and is in the highest degree unlikely, that such a programme was ever carried out.
The charge of heresy was one of the weapons used with most effect against Frederick II.
[289] Honorius II in 1229 forbade it to be studied or taught in the University of Paris. Innocent IV published some years later a still more sweeping prohibition.
[290] See Von Savigny, History of Roman Law in the Middle Ages, vol. iii. pp. 81, 341-347.
[291] Charles the Bold of Burgundy was a potentate incomparably stronger than the Emperor Frederick III from whom he sought the regal title.
[292] Cf. Sismondi, Républiques Italiennes, iv. chap. xxvii.
[293] See Dante, Paradiso, canto vi.
'Vieni a veder la tua Roma, che piange
Vedova, sola, e di e notte chiama: