[17] She desired a loan, which England made on this condition: Ibid., pp. 921–2.
[18] Ibid., pp. 937–9. Certain financial arrangements secured this concession.
[19] Ibid., pp. 939–75
[20] Amer. State Papers, Foreign, III. No. 271, pp. 735–48; U.S. Treaties and Conventions (ed. 1889), p. 405.
[21] This was inserted in the Treaty of Paris, Nov. 20, 1815: British and Foreign State Papers, 1815–6, p. 292.
[22] Ibid., 1816–7, pp. 33–74 (English version, 1823–4, p. 702 ff.).
[23] Cf. Ibid., 1817–8, p. 125 ff.
[24] This was the first meeting of the London ministers of the powers according to agreement; they assembled Dec. 4, 1817, and finally called a meeting of plenipotentiaries on the question of suppression at Aix-la-Chapelle, beginning Oct. 24, 1818. Among those present were Metternich, Richelieu, Wellington, Castlereagh, Hardenberg, Bernstorff, Nesselrode, and Capodistrias. Castlereagh made two propositions: 1. That the five powers join in urging Portugal and Brazil to abolish the trade May 20, 1820; 2. That the powers adopt the principle of a mutual qualified Right of Search. Cf. British and Foreign State Papers, 1818–9, pp. 21–88; Amer. State Papers, Foreign, V. No. 346, pp. 113–122.
[25] For cases, see 1 Acton, 240, the "Amedie," and 1 Dodson, 81, the "Fortuna;" quoted in U.S. Reports, 10 Wheaton, 66.
[26] Cf. the case of the French ship "Le Louis": 2 Dodson, 238; and also the case of the "San Juan Nepomuceno": 1 Haggard, 267.