[40] A man dying intestate left slaves, who became thus the property of the city; they were freed, and the town made the above resolve, May 17, 1774, in town meeting: Staples, Annals of Providence (1843), p. 236.

[41] R.I. Col. Rec., VII. 251–2.

[42] Bartlett's Index, p. 329; Arnold, History of Rhode Island, II. 444; R.I. Col. Rec., VIII. 618.

[43] R.I. Col. Rec., X. 7–8; Arnold, History of Rhode Island, II. 506.

[44] Bartlett's Index, p. 333; Narragansett Historical Register, II. 298–9. The number of slaves in Rhode Island has been estimated as follows:—

In1708,426.R.I. Col. Rec., IV. 59.
"1730, 1,648.R.I. Hist. Tracts, No. 19, pt. 2, p. 99.
"1749,3,077.Williams, History of the Negro Race in America, I. 281.
"1756,4,697.Ibid.
"1774,3,761.R.I. Col. Rec., VII. 253.

[45] Fowler, Local Law, etc., p. 124.

[46] The number of slaves in Connecticut has been estimated as follows:—

In1680,30.Conn. Col. Rec., III. 298.
"1730,700.Williams, History of the Negro Race in America, I. 259.
"1756,3,636.Fowler, Local Law, etc., p. 140.
"1762,4,590.Williams, History of the Negro Race in America, I. 260.
"1774,6,562.Fowler, Local Law, etc., p. 140.
"1782,6,281.Fowler, Local Law, etc., p. 140.
"1800,5,281.Ibid., p. 141.

[47] Conn. Col. Rec., XIV 329. Fowler (pp. 125–6) says that the law was passed in 1769, as does Sanford (p. 252). I find no proof of this. There was in Connecticut the same Biblical legislation on the trade as in Massachusetts. Cf. Laws of Connecticut (repr. 1865), p. 9; also Col. Rec., I. 77. For general duty acts, see Col. Rec., V 405; VIII. 22; IX. 283; XIII. 72, 125.