[68] For further proceedings, see Annals of Cong., 8 Cong. 1 sess. pp. 240–55, 1038–79, 1128–9, 1185–9. For the law, see Statutes at Large, II. 283–9.

[69] First, a bill was introduced applying the Northwest Ordinance to the Territory (Annals of Cong., 8 Cong. 2 sess. pp. 45–6); but this was replaced by a Senate bill (Ibid., p. 68; Senate Journal, repr. 1821, 8 Cong. 2 sess. III. 464). For the petition of the inhabitants, see Annals of Cong., 8 Cong. 2 sess. p. 727–8.

[70] The bill was hurried through, and there are no records of debate. Cf. Annals of Cong., 8 Cong. 2 sess. pp. 28–69, 727, 871, 957, 1016–20, 1213–5. In Senate Journal (repr. 1821), III., see Index, Bill No. 8. Importation of slaves was allowed by a clause erecting a Frame of Government "similar" to that of the Mississippi Territory.

[71] Annals of Cong., 9 Cong. 1 sess. p. 443. The whole trade was practically foreign, for the slavers merely entered the Negroes at Charleston and immediately reshipped them to New Orleans. Cf. Annals of Cong., 16 Cong. 1 sess. p. 264.

[72] House Journal (repr. 1826), 9 Cong. 1 sess. V. 264; Annals of Cong., 9 Cong. 1 sess. pp. 445, 878.

[73] House Reports, 9 Cong. 1 sess. Feb. 17, 1806.

[74] House Bill No. 123.

[75] Annals of Cong., 16 Cong. 2 sess. pp. 73–7. This report covers the time from Jan. 1, 1804, to Dec. 31, 1807. During that time the following was the number of ships engaged in the traffic:—

FromCharleston,61FromConnecticut, 1
"Rhode Island,59"Sweden,1
"Baltimore,4"Great Britain, 70
"Boston, 1"France,3
"Norfolk,2"202
The consignees of these slave ships were natives of
Charleston13
Rhode Island88
Great Britain91
France10
202
The following slaves were imported:—
ByBritishvessels19,949
"French"1,078
——
21,027
ByAmericanvessels:—
"Charlestonmerchants2,006
" Rhode Island"7,958
"Foreign"5,717
"other Northern"930
"other Southern"1,43718,048
Total number of slaves imported, 1804–739,075

It is, of course, highly probable that the Custom House returns were much below the actual figures.