STUDIES ON HOMER
AND
THE HOMERIC AGE.
I. PROLEGOMENA.
II. ACHÆIS:
OR,
THE ETHNOLOGY OF THE GREEK RACES.

BY THE
RIGHT HON. W. E. GLADSTONE, D.C.L.
M. P. FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD

Plenius ac melius Chrysippo et Crantore.—Horace.

OXFORD:
AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
M.DCCC.LVIII.

[THE CONTENTS.]

I. PROLEGOMENA.
SECT. I.
On the State of the Homeric Question.
Objects of this WorkPage [1]
Results thus far of the Homeric Controversy[2]
Improved apparatus for the Study of Homer[4]
Effect of the poems on Civilization[5]
They do not compete with the Holy Scriptures[6]
SECT. II.
The Place of Homer in Classical Education.
Study of Homer in the English Universities[9]
Homer should not be studied as a Poet only[11]
His claims compared with those of other Poets[14]
Study of Homer in the Public Schools[18]
SECT. III.
On the Historic Aims of Homer.
High organization of the Poems[21]
The presumption is that the Poet had Historic aims[22]
Positive signs of them[23]
Pursued even at some cost of Poetical beauty[26]
Minuter indications[28]
General tone[28]
Hypothesis of reproduction inadmissible[30]
What is chiefly meant by his Historic aims[35]
SECT. IV.
On the probable Date of Homer.
The main question: is he an original witness[36]
Adverse arguments[37]
Affirmative arguments[39]
SECT. V.
The probable Trustworthiness of the Text of Homer.
The received text to be adopted as a basis[42]
Failure of other methods[44]
State of the Manuscripts[46]
Complaints of interpolation[47]
Testimonies concerning the early use of the Poems[49]
Preservative power of the Recitations or matches[55]
Pseudo-Homeric poems[56]
Argument from the Cyclic poems[59]
The Alexandrian period[60]
Amount and quality of guarantees[64]
Improbability of wilful falsification[67]
Internal evidence of soundness in detail[69]
SECT. VI.
Place and Authority of Homer in Historical Inquiry.
Homer paramount as a literary authority[71]
He has suffered through credulity[73]
And through incredulity[79]
Proposed method of treatment[81]
Instances of contrary method, (1) Hellen and his family[82]
Authority of Hesiod[84]
Instance (2), personality of Helen[87]
Conclusion[89]
II. ACHÆIS.
ETHNOLOGY OF THE GREEK RACES.
SECT. I.
Scope of the Inquiry.
Preliminary objection of Mr. Grote stated[93]
Synopsis of national and tribal names to be examined[96]
SECT. II.
On the Pelasgians, and cognate races.
The Pelasgians[100]
Pelasgic Argos[101]
Dodona[106]
Thessaly and the Southern Islands[109]
Epithets for Pelasgians[113]
Use of this name in the singular[114]
The Pelasgians and Larissa[115]
The Arcadians Pelasgian[119]
Why προσέληνοι[121]
The Arcadians afterwards the Swiss of Greece[122]
The Graians or Greeks[123]
Ceres and the Pelasgians[124]
The Iaones or Ionians[127]
The Athenians in the Catalogue[129]
The Catalogue, vv. 546-9[129]
The same, vv. 550,[132]
The same, vv. 553-5[135]
Review of the Homeric evidence as to the Athenians[137]
Their relations with Minerva[140]
Post-Homeric evidence of the Pelasgianism of Attica[145]
The Pelasgians related to Egypt[148]
The Egyptians semi-fabulous to Homer[151]
Their Pelasgian resemblances, in Homer and otherwise[153]
The Greeks of the Iliad why never termed Pelasgian[156]
The Θρῇκες and Θρῃίκιοι[158]
The Caucones and Leleges[161]
SECT. III.
The Pelasgians: and certain States naturalized or akin to Greece.
Minos in Homer[166]
His origin[167]
His place in the nether world[168]
The power of Crete[169]
Two of the five races apparently Pelasgian[170]
The tradition of Deucalion[172]
The extent of the Minoan Empire[175]
Evidence of Post-Homeric tradition[176]
Circumstantial evidence[178]
The Lycians[181]
Their points of connection with Greece[183]
Elements of the population[185]
Cyprus[188]
Inhabitants probably Pelasgian[190]
No other name competes with the Pelasgian as designating the
first inhabitants of Greece[193]
The Pelasgians were the base or substratum of the Greek nation[194]
Post-Homeric testimony respecting them[195]
K. O. Müller’s Summary[200]
The Pelasgian language[203]
The Pelasgian route into Greece[205]
Probably twofold[206]
Route of the Helli[208]
Peloponnesus the old centre of power[209]
Derivation of the Pelasgian name[211]
SECT. IV.
On the Phœnicians and the Outer Geography of the Odyssey.
Tokens of the Phœnicians in Greece[216]
Limits of Homer’s Inner or Greek Geography[217]
And Greek Navigation[219]
His Outer Geography Phœnician[221]
The traditions connected therewith also Phœnician[223]
Minos the Ὀλοόφρων[225]
Commercial aptitude of the modern Greeks[227]
The Homeric Mouth of Ocean[228]
The two Geographical reports are blended into one[228]
The Siceli and Sicania[229]
Their site is probably on the Bruttian Coast[231]
The Epirus of Homer[234]
The Thesprotians in Homer[235]
The Cadmeans in Homer[239]
Period from which they date[240]
Conclusions respecting them[244]
SECT. V.
On the Catalogue.
The Greek Catalogue, properly an Array or Review[245]
The Preface[246]
The List[247]
The principle of arrangement[249]
The distribution in chief[250]
The sub-distribution[251]
Proofs of historic aim[255]
Genealogies of the Catalogue[256]
The Epilogue[259]
The Trojan Catalogue[261]
SECT. VI.
On the Hellenes of Homer.
The word Hellas the key to this inquiry[264]
List of passages where used[265]
Some of them admit the narrow sense[266]
Some refuse it[268]
None require it[272]
Hellenes in Il. ii. 684[274]
Panhellenes in Il. ii. 530[277]
Cephallenes in Il. ii. 631 and elsewhere[278]
The Helli or Selli[279]
Selli of the Scholiast of Aristophanes[280]
SECT. VII.
On the respective contributions of the Pelasgian and Hellenic factors to the compound of the Greek nation.
Contributions to Mythology[285]
Correspondences with Rome and Troy[287]
The Pelasgian religion less imaginative[289]
Their ritual development fuller[290]
Order of Priests in Homer not Hellenic[293]
Contributions to language[294]
Classes of words which agree[298]
Classes which differ[301]
Evidence from names of persons[307]
General rules of discrimination[309]
Names of the Pelasgian class[311]
Names of the Hellenic class[317]
Contributions to political ideas[320]
To martial ideas[320]
Corporal education and Games[322]
Music and Song[329]
Supposed Pelasgianism of the Troic age[331]
The traditions of Hunting[332]
The practice of Navigation[336]
Summary of the case[338]
States especially Hellic or Pelasgic[342]
SECT. VIII.
On the three greater Homeric appellatives.
Modes of formation for names of peoples[346]
The three greater appellatives not synonymous[348]
Proofs of their distinctive use[350]
The Argive Juno, Argive Helen[353]
The Danaans of Homer[355]
Epithets of the three appellatives[356]
The Danaan name dynastic[359]
Compared with the Cadmean name[361]
Epoch of the dynasty[363]
Post-Homeric tradition[366]
Application of the name Argos[368]
Achaic and Iasian Argos[373]
The phrase μέσον Ἄργος[378]
The Apian land[379]
Summary of geographical conclusions[380]
Etymology of the word Argos[381]
Its connection with ἔργον[384]
The etymology tested by kindred words[388]
The Danaan Argeians of Od. viii. 578[391]
The Argive Juno[392]
Transition to Achæans[393]
Relation of Argeian and Pelasgian names[396]
The etymology illustrated[397]
Different extent of Ἀργεῖοι and Ἄργος[401]
Propositions as to the Achæan name[402]
Particulars of its use[403]
Signs of its leaning to the aristocracy[406]
Mode of its application in Ithaca[411]
Its local sense in Thessaly[416]
In Crete[417]
In Pylos[418]
In Eastern Peloponnesus[419]
Force of the name Παναχαιοὶ[420]
The Æolid and Æolian names[423]
The Heraclids in Homer[425]
The descent of the Æolids[427]
The earliest Hellenic thrones in Greece[429]
The Danaan and Argive names used nationally in poetry only[431]
Summary of the evidence[433]
Later literary history of the three great appellatives[436]
Their value as primitive History[437]
SECT. IX.
On the Homeric title of ἄναξ ἀνδρῶν.
Difference between Epithets and Titles[440]
Examples of Homeric titles[443]
The Βασιλεὺς of Homer[443]
Common interpretations of the ἄναξ ἀνδρῶν[443]
Some particulars of its use in Homer[446]
How far connected with metrical convenience[447]
The κρείων and the ποιμὴν λαῶν[448]
Arguments for a specific meaning in ἄναξ ἀνδρῶν[450]
Persons to whom the title is applied[453]
Persons to whom it might have been applied[455]
Associations of reverence with it[456]
It may indicate patriarchal chieftaincy[459]
Presumptions of this in the case of Agamemnon[461]
Propositions respecting his extraction and station[463]
Arguments against his Hellenic descent considered[465]
Connection of Tantalus with Greece and with Pelops[466]
As to the seat of his power[470]
Homeric notices of Pelops[471]
The Achæans rose with him[472]
They came from Thessaly[474]
The Dorians appropriate the Pelopid succession[477]
Protest against the popular tradition of the Hellenidæ[480]
Which, however, bears witness to the connection with Thessaly[481]
Case of Agamemnon summed up[482]
The cases of Anchises and Æneas[484]
Presumptive evidence as to Anchises[486]
Presumptive evidence as to Æneas[486]
Evidence from the Dardanid genealogy[489]
From the horses of Tros[490]
Evidence summed up[491]
Signs of kin between Trojans and Greeks[492]
Signs connected with the Hellic name[496]
The Hellespont of Homer[497]
The gift of Echepolus Anchisiades[499]
Twofold bond, Hellic as well as Pelasgic[499]
Case of Augeias stated[500]
Notes of connection between Elis and the North[502]
Relation of Augeias to the name Ephyre[504]
Cluster of apparently cognate names[505]
The race of Φῆρες[509]
Common root of all these names[510]
Probable signification of Ἐφύρη[513]
Places bearing the name Ἐφύρη[515]
Summary of the evidence for Augeias[519]
Case of Euphetes[520]
The site of his Ephyre[521]
Case of Eumelus[526]
The ἄναξ ἀνδρῶν is descended from Jupiter[529]
The four notes of the ἄναξ ἀνδρῶν[531]
Negative proofs[532]
Persons with the four notes but without the title[536]
Its disappearance with Homer[538]
Signs in the Iliad of political disorganization[539]
More extensively in the Odyssey[542]
General significancy of the title ἄναξ ἀνδρῶν[543]
SECT. X.
On the connection of the Hellenes and Achæans with the East.
The Achæan name has no mark of a Greek origin[545]
Means for pursuing the inquiry[546]
The two groups of Indo-European languages[547]
Corresponding distinction of races[548]
Province of Fars or Persia proper[549]
Ascendancy of the Persians[550]
Relation of the Germani to the Celts[551]
And to the Hellenes[552]
The Persian tribe of Γερμάνιοι[554]
The Homeric traces of the Persian name[555]
The Achæan name in Persia[556]
Its probable etymology[557]
The Persians according to Herodotus[558]
The comparison as to religious belief[561]
As to ritual, and other resemblances[563]
Evidence of the Behistun inscription[565]
The organization established by Darius[566]
Presumptions from the term Βασιλεύς[567]
Hellenic traits in modern Persia[568]
The Eelliats[571]
Media a probable source of the Pelasgi[571]
Addenda[573]

STUDIES ON HOMER
AND
THE HOMERIC AGE.

I. PROLEGOMENA.[1]